Group harmony in the workplace: Conception, measurement, and validation

No Thumbnail Available

Date

2016-12

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Springer

Abstract

Based on a literature review of Chinese traditional philosophies and social science research on social harmony we formulated the group harmony construct, developed a scale, and tested its validity in two studies on 167 top management groups from China. Study 1 demonstrated convergent and discriminant validity of group harmony and evaluated its predictive validity against well-established constructs of relationship conflict, task conflict, group cohesiveness, psychological safety, and conflict avoidance. Study 2 further examined the construct and nomological validity of group harmony and tested the effects of group harmony and found that, as hypothesized, group harmony enhanced group innovative performance through increasing knowledge sharing among group members. However, instead of motivating innovative performance through fostering moderate levels of task conflict, group harmony enhanced innovative performance through reducing task conflict on the one hand and neutralizing the negative effect of task conflict on the other. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

Description

Keywords

Business & economics, Group harmony, Group cohesiveness, Relationship conflict, Task conflict, Top management groups, Top management teams, Work group, Ethical leadership, Relationship conflict, Reward allocation, Integrative model, Social identity, Creativity Innovation

Citation

Chen, C. C. vd. (2016). "Group harmony in the workplace: Conception, measurement, and validation". Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 33(4), 903-934.