Publication:
A comparison of the survival and implantation rates of blastocysts that were vitrified on post-fertilization day five, six and seven

Placeholder

Organizational Units

Authors

AVCI, BERRİN
KUŞPINAR, GÖKTAN
UNCU, GÜRKAN
Gürkan, Uncu
Berrin, Avcı
Işıl, Kasapoğlu
Göktan, Kuşpınar
Seda, Sarıbal

Authors

Barış, Ata

Advisor

Language

Publisher:

Taylor & Francis Ltd

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Abstract

The goal of this retrospective cohort study was to compare survival, implantation, clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates between blastocysts that were vitrified on post-fertilization days 5, 6 and 7. Before vitrification, blastocysts were evaluated in terms of morphology and blastocyst expansion, inner cell mass and trophectoderm quality. They were thawed and transfered in a subsequent artificial cycle. Embryo implantation rates were 39%, 25% and 25% for blastocysts that were vitrified on days 5, 6, and 7, respectively (p = 0.006). Clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates were 19%, 12%, 13% (p = 0.100) and 9%, 7%, 12% (p = 0.99) for days 5, 6 and 7 blastocysts, respectively. Day 5 blastocysts had significantly higher full-collapsing score after assisted-hatching compared to days 6 and 7 blastocysts (p = 0.014). As blastocyst quality increased, implantation and clinical pregnancy rates increased in all groups and both parameters were statistically significantly higher on day 5 blastocysts than on days 6 or 7 (p = 0.001). It was clearly found that good quality blastocysts obtained on day 5 have higher implantation and clinical pregnancy rates than 6th and 7th day cryopreserved embryos. There were no statistically significant differences between the cryopreserved embryos on days 6 and 7 regarding the implantation, clinic and ongoing pregnancy rates.

Description

Source:

Keywords:

Keywords

In-vitro fertilization, Embryo transfers, Transfer cycles, Live-birth, Vitrification, Pregnancy, Morphology, Cleavage, Fresh, Time, Blastocysts, Vitrification, Embryo viability, Late blastulation, Science & technology, Life sciences & biomedicine, Obstetrics & gynecology, Reproductive biology

Citation

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

1

Views

0

Downloads

View PlumX Details