Çocuk teslimi ve çocukla kişisel ilişki kurulmasına ilişkin mahkeme kararlarının icrası (ÇKK m. 41F)
Date
2024-07-26
Authors
Kaya, Buse Nur
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi
Abstract
Çocuk, on sekiz yaşını doldurmamış ve henüz erginliğini kazanmamış kişi olup çocuğun üstün yararının korunması, çocuk ile alakalı her konuda gözetilmesi gereken ilkedir. Mahkemelerce verilen kararların yerine getirilmesi de bu kapsamdadır. Çocuk teslimi ve çocukla kişisel ilişki kurulmasına ilişkin kararlar, İcra-İflas Kanunu kapsamında yerine getirilmekteyken, çocuğun taşınır bir mal olarak değerlendirilecek biçimde zor kullanarak yerine getirildiğinden bu durumun çocukların psikolojik olarakciddi anlamda zarar görmesine sebep olduğu gerekçesiyle eleştirilmiştir. 7343 sayılı Kanun ile Çocuk Koruma Kanunu’nda yapılan değişiklikler neticesinde çocuk teslimive çocukla kişisel ilişki kurulmasına ilişkin kararların yerine getirilmesi İcra-İflasKanunu’nun kapsamından çıkarılarak Çocuk Koruma Kanunu kapsamına dahiledilmiştir. Çocuk Koruma Kanunu’nun 41/A ve devamı maddelerindeki düzenlemelergereğince çocuk teslimi ve çocukla kişisel ilişki kurulmasına ilişkin kararlar Adalet Bakanlığı’na bağlı olan Mağdur Hakları ve Adli Destek Müdürlükleri tarafından yerinegetirilecektir. Getirilen sistemde uzmanların süreçteki etkinliği ve aile mahkemelerininsürece müdahalesi arttırılmış, çocuğun üstün yararının temini amaçlanmıştır. Çalışmamızda çocuk teslimi ve çocukla kişisel ilişki kurulmasına ilişkin mahkeme kararlarının yerine getirilmesi Çocuk Koruma Kanunu düzenlemeleri doğrultusunda incelenmiştir.
A child is a person who has not reached the age of eighteen and has not yet reached adulthood, and the protection of child’s best interest is a principle that should be observed in all matters related to the child. The fulfillment of the decisions made by the courts is also within this scope. Decisions regarding child visititation and custody have been criticized on the grounds that this situation causes serious psychological harm to children, since they are carried out by force in such a way that the child is considered a movable property, while they are carried out within the scope of the Enforcement-Bankruptcy Law. As a result of the amendments made to the Child Protection Law by Law No. 7343, the fulfillment of decisions related to child visititation and custody havebeen excluded from the scope of the Enforcement-Bankruptcy Code and included in the scope of the Child Protection Law. In accordance with the regulations in Articles 41 / A and its continuation of the Child Protection Law, decisions on child visititation and custody will be carried out by the Victim Rights and Judicial Support Directorates affiliated to the Ministry of Justice. In the system introduced, the effectiveness of specialists in the process and the intervention of family courts in the process have been increased, and it is aimed to ensure the child’s best interest. In our study, the fulfillment of decisions related to child visititation and custody examined in accordance with the regulations of the Child Protection Law.
A child is a person who has not reached the age of eighteen and has not yet reached adulthood, and the protection of child’s best interest is a principle that should be observed in all matters related to the child. The fulfillment of the decisions made by the courts is also within this scope. Decisions regarding child visititation and custody have been criticized on the grounds that this situation causes serious psychological harm to children, since they are carried out by force in such a way that the child is considered a movable property, while they are carried out within the scope of the Enforcement-Bankruptcy Law. As a result of the amendments made to the Child Protection Law by Law No. 7343, the fulfillment of decisions related to child visititation and custody havebeen excluded from the scope of the Enforcement-Bankruptcy Code and included in the scope of the Child Protection Law. In accordance with the regulations in Articles 41 / A and its continuation of the Child Protection Law, decisions on child visititation and custody will be carried out by the Victim Rights and Judicial Support Directorates affiliated to the Ministry of Justice. In the system introduced, the effectiveness of specialists in the process and the intervention of family courts in the process have been increased, and it is aimed to ensure the child’s best interest. In our study, the fulfillment of decisions related to child visititation and custody examined in accordance with the regulations of the Child Protection Law.
Description
Keywords
Çocuk teslimi, Çocukla kişisel ilişki kurulması, Çocuğun üstün yararı, Çocuk koruma kanunu, Child visititaion, Custody, Child’s best interest, Child protection law