Honeybee (Apis mellifera ligustica) use of color and pattern in making foraging choices

dc.contributor.authorWells, Harrington
dc.contributor.authorCoburn, Philip
dc.contributor.authorAthens, Michael
dc.contributor.authorHill, Peggy S. M.
dc.contributor.buuauthorÇakmak, İbrahim
dc.contributor.departmentUludağ Üniversitesi/Ziraat Fakültesi.tr_TR
dc.contributor.researcheridAAH-2558-2021tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid57207796431tr_TR
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-08T06:11:47Z
dc.date.available2021-12-08T06:11:47Z
dc.date.issued2000-10
dc.description.abstractHoneybees can use various kinds of information, including color and pattern, in choosing flowers during foraging. We offered free-flying bees a dimorphic artificial patch of radial and bilateral blue/white flowers in order to examine three hypotheses to explain the noted increase in visitation to the flower type offering a lower caloric reward, i.e., optical resolution, dyslectic interpretation, and cognition related to pattern colors. When bees were offered a color pattern rather than a simple color difference to differentiate flower types, they did not always make choices predicted by theory. Honeybees foraged randomly on both flower morphs when rewards were equal and chose the higher caloric reward more often when rewards were different. However, they visited the less rewarding choice more than 33% of the time. Increasing the size of the flower surface by doubling the dimensions did not decrease visitation to the less rewarding flower type, suggesting that visual acuity is not the limiting factor in flower sizes used. When flower colors that increased contrast (yellow vs, blue) were used in the dimorphic parch, visitation rate to the less rewarding flower type did not decline, nor did this 'error rate' decrease when identical patterns were used with only partial color differences. Adding an orientation reference on each flower decreased the frequency with which the less rewarding flower type was chosen from 36 to 26%, possibly because foragers were induced to switch from a global cue (e.g., patch) to a local cue (e.g.. flower). The rate with which the less rewarding flower type is chosen appears to be a function of honeybee use of cognitive and sensory modalities, rather than limited memory and correlative abilities.en_US
dc.identifier.citationWells, H. vd. (2000). "Honeybee (Apis mellifera ligustica) use of color and pattern in making foraging choices". Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society, 73(4), 195-207.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage207tr_TR
dc.identifier.issn0022-8567
dc.identifier.issn1937-2353
dc.identifier.issue4tr_TR
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-0034923411tr_TR
dc.identifier.startpage195tr_TR
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.jstor.org/stable/25085970
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11452/23058
dc.identifier.volume73tr_TR
dc.identifier.wos000169799100002tr_TR
dc.indexed.scopusScopusen_US
dc.indexed.wosSCIEen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherKansas Entomological Societyen_US
dc.relation.collaborationYurt dışıtr_TR
dc.relation.journalJournal of the Kansas Entomological Societytr_TR
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergitr_TR
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectEntomologyen_US
dc.subjectFlower constancyen_US
dc.subjectBeesen_US
dc.subjectVisionen_US
dc.subjectDiscriminationen_US
dc.subjectRecognitionen_US
dc.subjectParametersen_US
dc.subjectStimulien_US
dc.subjectRegionsen_US
dc.subjectSizeen_US
dc.subjectRisken_US
dc.subjectBeeen_US
dc.subjectColoren_US
dc.subjectFlower visitingen_US
dc.subjectForaging behavioren_US
dc.subjectVisual cueen_US
dc.subject.scopusBombus; Pollinators; Foragersen_US
dc.subject.wosEntomologyen_US
dc.titleHoneybee (Apis mellifera ligustica) use of color and pattern in making foraging choicesen_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.wos.quartileQ4en_US

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: