Hysteresis in unemployment: Evidence from 23 OECD countries

dc.contributor.buuauthorAkay, Hülya Kanalıcı
dc.contributor.buuauthorNargeleçekenler, Mehmet
dc.contributor.buuauthorYımaz, Feridun
dc.contributor.departmentUludağ Üniversitesi/İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi/Ekonomi Bölümü.tr_TR
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-5979-3277tr_TR
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-2134-5705tr_TR
dc.contributor.researcheridAAG-8552-2021tr_TR
dc.contributor.researcheridAAG-6238-2021tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid22133345800tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid22135626200tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid22137139500tr_TR
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-21T11:27:50Z
dc.date.available2022-02-21T11:27:50Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.description.abstractUnemployment is one of the most important problems that all countries must overcome. As a result, it has become one of the centrally explored issues in macroeconomics, and several theories have been proposed to explain the existence of high unemployment rates. Traditional theories describe movements of unemployment as fluctuations around a natural rate. However, theories that rely on a natural rate of unemployment have been challenged by hysteresis theories. According to hysteresis theories, all shocks have permanent effects on the level of unemployment. This paper tests hysteresis effects in unemployment using panel data for 23 OECD countries covering the period 1963 - 2007. The paper applies both a univariate time series and a panel data unit root test with and without a structural break to test for unemployment hysteresis in OECD countries against the alternative of a natural rate. The results point to the rejection of the hysteresis hypothesis for the OECD and are compatible with structuralist theories as described by the structuralist view.en_US
dc.identifier.citationAkay, H. K. vd. (2011). "Hysteresis in unemployment: Evidence from 23 OECD countries''. Ekonomicky Casopis, 59(5), 488-505.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage505tr_TR
dc.identifier.issn0013-3035
dc.identifier.issue5tr_TR
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-79960687308tr_TR
dc.identifier.startpage488tr_TR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11452/24553
dc.identifier.volume59tr_TR
dc.identifier.wos000292792100004tr_TR
dc.indexed.scopusScopusen_US
dc.indexed.wosSSCIen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSlovak Academic Pressen_US
dc.relation.journalEkonomicky Casopisen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergitr_TR
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectBusiness & economicsen_US
dc.subjectHysteresisen_US
dc.subjectMonetary policyen_US
dc.subjectUnemploymenten_US
dc.subjectPanel unit root testen_US
dc.subjectUnit-root testsen_US
dc.subjectAutoregressive time-seriesen_US
dc.subjectStructural breaksen_US
dc.subjectPanel-dataen_US
dc.subjectInflationen_US
dc.subjectModelsen_US
dc.subjectRatesen_US
dc.subjectHysteresisen_US
dc.subjectMacroeconomicsen_US
dc.subjectMonetary policyen_US
dc.subjectOECDen_US
dc.subjectPanel dataen_US
dc.subjectUnemploymenten_US
dc.subject.scopusUnit Root Tests; Spurious Regression; Structural Breaksen_US
dc.subject.wosEconomicsen_US
dc.titleHysteresis in unemployment: Evidence from 23 OECD countriesen_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.wos.quartileQ4en_US

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: