Publication:
Interference by anti-cancer chemotherapeutic agents in the MTT-tumor chemosensitivity assay

No Thumbnail Available

Date

2004

Authors

Ulukaya, Engin
Çolakoğulları, Mukaddes

Authors

Wood, E.J.

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Karger

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

Background: One of the major goals of oncology is to predict the response of patients with cancer to chemotherapeutic agents by employing laboratory methods variously called 'tumor chemosensitivity assays', 'drug response assays', or 'drug sensitivity assays', in vitro. The MTT assay is one of the methods used to predict the drug response in malignancies. However, it may suffer from interference by the anticancer drugs with the MTT assay. Methods: The MTT assay, a colorimetric viability assay, was checked in a cell-free system in terms of its possible chemical interactions with 22 different anticancer drugs. Results: It was found that epirubicine, paclitaxel, doxetaxel, and cisplatin caused a relatively significant increase in absorbance values, resulting in the MTT assay giving rise to false results (untrue increase in viability) although most of the drugs tested did not seem to cause any significant change. Conclusion: It was concluded that before employing the MTT assay, drugs (or any kind of substances) to be included in the assay should be checked first in terms of possible chemical interactions with MTT, otherwise it may be impossible to evaluate the MTT viability assay results correctly.

Description

Keywords

MTT assay, Tumor chemosensitivity assay, Anticancer drugs, Interference, Chronic lymphocytic-leukemia, Recurrent ovarian-cancer, Cell-lines, In-vitro, Luminescence assay, Tetrazolium assay, Invitro assay, Vivo, Cytotoxicity, Sensitivity, Oncology, Pharmacology & pharmacy

Citation

Wood, E.J. vd. (2004). “Interference by anti-cancer chemotherapeutic agents in the MTT-tumor chemosensitivity assay”. Chemotherapy, 50(1), 43-50.

Collections

0

Views

0

Downloads

Search on Google Scholar