The effect of 0.25% apraclonidine in preventing intraocular pressure elevation after Nd : YAG laser posterior capsulotomy

Date

1998

Authors

Şimşek, Şaban
Demirok, Ahmet
Çınar, Adnan
Yaşar, Tekin

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Sage Publications

Abstract

Purpose. The efficacy and adverse effects of 0.25% apraclonidine on intraocular pressure (IOP) after Nd: YAG laser posterior capsulotomy were investigated, and the results were compared with placebo, 0.50% timolol maleate and 1% apraclonidine. Methods. Eighty eyes were randomly assigned to four groups of 20 eyes. In a double-masked design, the groups were treated with placebo (group I), 0.50% timolol maleate (group 2), 1% apraclonidine (group 3), 0.25% apraclonidine (group 4) one hour before and five minutes after Nd:YAG laser posterior capsulotomy. IOP was measured by applanation tonometry I hour before (baseline IOP) and 1, 3, 24 hours after capsulotomy. Results. The average baseline IOP increased respectively 3.90 +/- 5.35, 5.95 +/- 5.32, 1.15 +/- 3.20 mmHg in the first group 1, 3 and 24 hours post-treatment. There were significant differences between baseline IOP and 1 and 3 hours but not at 24 hours (p=0.004, p=0.001, p=0.13). IOP increased 0.40 +/- 4.08, 0.75 +/- 5.33, 0.80 +/- 6.03 mmHg in the second group at the same times. The differences between the average baseline IOP and the 1, 3 and 24 h measurement were not significant (p=0.83, p=0.65, p=0.93). In the third group, IOP decreased 3.70 +/- 2.40, 3.30 +/- 2.47, 2.65 +/- 1.56 mmHg at the measurement times, with significant differences between the average baseline IOP and the 1, 3 and 24 hour measurements (p=0.001, p=0.0001, p=0.01). In the fourth group IOP increased 0.35 +/- 3.32 mmHg at 1 hour, but decreased 1.25 +/- 3.41, 0.90 +/- 2. 07 mmHg at 3 and 24 hours. The differences were not significant (p = 0.94, p = 0.16, p = 0.08). When the 0.25% and 1% apraclonidine groups were compared, there were significant differences between the average IOP at 1 hour in both groups but not at 3 and 24 hours (p=0.01, p = 0.17, p = 0.21). Similarly, there were no significant differences between the average IOP at the same times when the 0.25% apraclonidine group was compared with the timolol group (p = 0.30, p = 0.08, p = 0.16). Some systemic and local side effects were seen in the timolol and 1% apraclonidine groups, but none with 0.25% apraclonidine. Conclusions. It was concluded that 0.25% apraclonidine is effective in preventing the early elevation of IOP after Nd:YAG laser posterior capsulotomy and may offer an alternative to 0.50% timolol maleate and 1% apraclonidine.

Description

Keywords

Ophthalmology, Nd : YAG laser, Posterior capsulotomy, Apraclonidine, Timolol maleate, 1-percent apraclonidine, Dose-response, Neodymium, Timolol, Rise, Eyes

Citation

Şimşek, S. vd. (1998). "The effect of 0.25% apraclonidine in preventing intraocular pressure elevation after Nd : YAG laser posterior capsulotomy". European Journal of Ophthalmology, 8(3), 167-172.