Publication:
Inconsistency of karyotyping and array comparative genomic hybridization (acgh) in a mosaic turner syndrome case

dc.contributor.authorTülay, Pınar
dc.contributor.authorErgören, Mahmut Çerkez
dc.contributor.authorAlkaya, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorYaycı, Eyüp
dc.contributor.buuauthorTemel, Şehime Gülsüm
dc.contributor.buuauthorTEMEL, ŞEHİME GÜLSÜN
dc.contributor.buuauthorÖZEMRİ SAĞ, ŞEBNEM
dc.contributor.departmentBursa Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Genetik Anabilim Dalı.
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-9802-0880
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-03T07:59:21Z
dc.date.available2024-09-03T07:59:21Z
dc.date.issued2021-02-11
dc.description.abstractPurpose Turner syndrome is a sex chromosomal aberration where majority of the patients have 45,X karyotype, while several patients are mosaic involving 45,X/46,XX; 46,X,i(Xq); and other variants. Cytogenetic analysis, karyotyping, is considered to be the "gold standard" to detect numerical and structural chromosomal abnormalities. In the recent years, alternative approaches, such as array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH), have been widely used in genetic analysis to detect numerical abnormalities as well as unbalanced structural rearrangements. In this study, we report the use of karyotyping as well as aCGH in detecting a possible Turner syndrome variant.Methods An apparent 16-year-old female was clinically diagnosed as Turner syndrome with premature ovarian failure and short stature. The genetic diagnosis was performed for the patient and the parents by karyotyping analysis. aCGH was also performed for the patient.Main Findings Cytogenetic analysis of the patient was performed showing variant Turner syndrome (46,X,i(X)(q10)[26]/46,X,del(X)(q11.2)[11]/45,X[8]/46,XX[5]). The patient's aCGH result revealed that she has a deletion of 57,252kb of Xp22.33-p11.21 region; arr[GRCh37] Xp22.33-p11.21 (310,932-57,563-078)X1. Both aCGH and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) results suggested that short stature Homeobox-containing ( SHOX ) gene, which is located on Xp22.33, was deleted, though FISH result indicated that this was in a mosaic pattern.Conclusion In the recent years, aCGH has become the preferred method in detecting numerical abnormalities and unbalanced chromosomal rearrangements. However, its use is hindered by its failure of detecting mosaicism, especially low-level partial mosaicism. Therefore, although the resolution of the aCGH is higher, the cytogenetic investigation is still the first in line to detect mosaicism.
dc.identifier.doi10.1055/s-0041-1722974
dc.identifier.endpage132
dc.identifier.issn2699-9404
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.startpage128
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1722974
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11452/44277
dc.identifier.volume7
dc.identifier.wos000618846200001
dc.indexed.wosWOS.ESCI
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherThieme Medical Publ Inc
dc.relation.journalGlobal Medical Genetics
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectChromosomal mosaicism
dc.subjectImbalances
dc.subjectWomen
dc.subjectCare
dc.subjectCgh
dc.subjectTurner syndrome
dc.subjectMosaicism
dc.subjectPartial mosaicism
dc.subjectAcgh
dc.subjectCytogenetics
dc.subjectScience & technology
dc.subjectLife sciences & biomedicine
dc.subjectGenetics & heredity
dc.titleInconsistency of karyotyping and array comparative genomic hybridization (acgh) in a mosaic turner syndrome case
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationf513efaa-a54e-4cfa-840f-28e2fbdc001a
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationdf8aeae7-a31e-454f-a84a-198138a42763
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryf513efaa-a54e-4cfa-840f-28e2fbdc001a

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Temel_vd_2021.pdf
Size:
256.31 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections