Yayın:
The place and the efficacy of infectious disease consultations in the hospitals

dc.contributor.authorErdem, H.
dc.contributor.authorKurtaran, B.
dc.contributor.authorArun, O.
dc.contributor.authorYlmaz, H.
dc.contributor.authorÇelebi, G.
dc.contributor.authorÖzkaya, H. D.
dc.contributor.authorKaya, S.
dc.contributor.authorBirengel, S.
dc.contributor.authorGüner, R.
dc.contributor.authorDemiroǧlu, Y. Z.
dc.contributor.authorDemirdal, T.
dc.contributor.authorTekin-Koruk, S.
dc.contributor.authorCoşkun, O.
dc.contributor.authorKazak, E.
dc.contributor.authorÇelen, M. K.
dc.contributor.authorAkova, M.
dc.contributor.authorTimurkaynak, F.
dc.contributor.authorAlpay, Y.
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, E.
dc.contributor.authorSaçar, S.
dc.contributor.authorAydin, A. F.
dc.contributor.authorBodur, H.
dc.contributor.authorElald, N.
dc.contributor.authorInal, A. S.
dc.contributor.authorSaba, R.
dc.contributor.authorTok, D.
dc.contributor.authorAǧalar, C.
dc.contributor.authorCandevir, A.
dc.contributor.authorParlak, M.
dc.contributor.authorSipahi, O. R.
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, G.
dc.contributor.authorKoçak, N.
dc.contributor.authorÖncü, S.
dc.contributor.authorSirmatel, F.
dc.contributor.authorKüçükardali, Y.
dc.contributor.authorGüzel-Tunçcan, O.
dc.contributor.authorMete, B.
dc.contributor.authorDoyuk-Kartal, E.
dc.contributor.authorUlcay, A.
dc.contributor.authorŞenol, E.
dc.contributor.authorDayan, S.
dc.contributor.authorLeblebicioǧlu, H.
dc.contributor.authorTabak, F.
dc.contributor.authorGorenek, L.
dc.contributor.authorUlusoy, S.
dc.contributor.authorAyaz, C.
dc.contributor.authorErgonul, O.
dc.contributor.authorAksu, H. S. Z.
dc.contributor.buuauthorYILMAZ, EMEL
dc.contributor.departmentTıp Fakültesi
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-3894-1231
dc.contributor.scopusid22037135100
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-13T10:17:14Z
dc.date.issued2012-03-01
dc.description.abstractOur study aims to determine the efficacy of infectious disease consultations and the interrelations between doctors in this social laboratory. This study was conducted at 34 centers located in 22 cities across Turkey and contributed by 210 infectious disease specialists (IDSs) and 970 non-infectious disease specialists (NIDSs), totaling 1180 medical doctors. Infectious disease specialists and NIDSs have separately contributed by responding to questionnaires designed specifically for the consultation process. It appears that a satisfactory collaboration has been established between IDSs and NIDSs during the consultation practices. There are some discrepancies in the perceptions of some of the NIDSs. These are the evaluation of patients holistically, the expectation of NIDSs in critical infection cases to start the therapy immediately, losing the support of drug companies by NIDSs, and the restriction of NIDSs in routine medical practice. On the other hand, NIDSs seem to have real problems in the diagnosis or treatment of infectious diseases. The consultation service provided by the IDSs in Turkey is widely accepted among other clinicians and appears to be of a crucial importance. Copyright © 2012 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/IPC.0b013e31823c4b25
dc.identifier.endpage136
dc.identifier.issn1056-9103
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84858823668
dc.identifier.startpage131
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11452/52557
dc.identifier.volume20
dc.indexed.scopusScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.journalInfectious Diseases in Clinical Practice
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectInfectious diseases
dc.subjectHospitals
dc.subjectConsultation
dc.titleThe place and the efficacy of infectious disease consultations in the hospitals
dc.typeReview
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.indexed.atScopus
relation.isAuthorOfPublication149687a4-4cd9-46c4-8b3a-8cbdec8ac7e9
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery149687a4-4cd9-46c4-8b3a-8cbdec8ac7e9

Dosyalar