Publication:
Management of distal radius fractures: Comparison of three methods

dc.contributor.authorMert, Murat
dc.contributor.authorKovalak, Emrah
dc.contributor.authorKanay, Enes
dc.contributor.authorObut, Abdullah
dc.contributor.authorOzturkmen, Yusuf
dc.contributor.buuauthorErmutlu, Cenk
dc.contributor.buuauthorERMUTLU, CENK
dc.contributor.departmentTıp Fakültesi
dc.contributor.departmentOrtopedi Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.contributor.researcheridAAB-2795-2021
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-02T07:20:33Z
dc.date.available2024-07-02T07:20:33Z
dc.date.issued2020-08-19
dc.description.abstractIntroductionDistal radius fractures are the most common type of all extremity fractures. It is generally accepted that fractures with more than 2 mm step-off in the radiocarpal joint and greater than 10 degrees dorsal tilt should he treated surgically. However, the ideal technique for surgical management is still a point of debate. We performed cross-sectional data analysis to compare the results of three treatments methods - volar locking plate (VLP), external fixation (EF), Kirschner wire (K-wire) - in patients with distal radius fractures, and compared the clinical, functional, and radiological resultsMaterials and methodsForty-four patients with distal radius fractures who underwent fixation with VLP, K-wire or EF between 2011 and 2013 were included in the study. All fractures were classified according to the Miiller's Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Osteosynthesefragen (AO) and Frykman's classifications. Routine radiographs were taken at the postoperative three weeks, six weeks, and three months. Radial inclination, volar tilt, radial length and ulnar variance were assessed on the follow-up visits and additionally at the follow -up for the study. The patient-based Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score system and the physician-based MAYO scale were used to evaluate functional outcomes. Radiological and functional outcomes between three surgical modalities were compared and statistically analyzed.ResultsThe average age at the time of surgery was 52 years (range = 35-69 years). Of a total of 44 patients, 28 were operated with VLP, 11 were with K-wire and five with EF. Satisfactory reduction was achieved in all fractures, and all of the fractures healed. DASH and MAYO scores were similar in all groups. Regarding radiographic parameters, there was no significant difference in radial inclination, volar tilt, radial length and ulnar variance between the treatment modality groups. When evaluated based on fracture geometry, the DASH score was significantly higher in the patients with AO23A type fracture compared to the patients with AO23B and AO23C type fractures. As for MAYO score, all AO23 groups had similar outcomes.ConclusionsSurgical treatment options VLP, EF, and K-wire provide adequate fixation, satisfactory radiological, and functional results for the management of distal radius fractures of various severities. The optimal treatment approach depends on individual features, and the choice for an internal fixation or closed reduction method for the restoration of wrist function should be evaluated thoroughly by the operating surgeon considering the patient-related variations.
dc.identifier.doi10.7759/cureus.9875
dc.identifier.issue8
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.9875
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11452/42700
dc.identifier.volume12
dc.identifier.wos000560709500017
dc.indexed.wosWOS.ESCI
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringernature
dc.relation.journalCureus Journal Of Medical Science
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectLocking-plate fixation
dc.subjectExternal fixation
dc.subjectVolar plate
dc.subjectDorsal
dc.subjectDistal radius fracture
dc.subjectExternal fixator
dc.subjectK-wire
dc.subjectPinning
dc.subjectPlate fixation
dc.subjectWrist fractures
dc.subjectScience & technology
dc.subjectLife sciences & biomedicine
dc.subjectMedicine, general & internal
dc.subjectGeneral & internal medicine
dc.titleManagement of distal radius fractures: Comparison of three methods
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.departmentTıp Fakültesi/Ortopedi Ana Bilim Dalı
relation.isAuthorOfPublication95736544-3429-4e55-b3ae-5ee564bd4060
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery95736544-3429-4e55-b3ae-5ee564bd4060

Files

Collections