Yayın:
Effectiveness of physical therapy and epidural steroid injections in lumbar spinal stenosis

dc.contributor.buuauthorKoç, Zarife
dc.contributor.buuauthorÖzçakır, Şüheda
dc.contributor.buuauthorSivrioğlu, Koncuy
dc.contributor.buuauthorGurbet, Alp
dc.contributor.buuauthorKüçükoğlu, Selçuk
dc.contributor.departmentTıp Fakültesi
dc.contributor.departmentFiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-0851-3620
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-6503-8232
dc.contributor.researcheridAAH-5375-2021
dc.contributor.researcheridAAG-8193-2021
dc.contributor.researcheridAAG-8211-2021
dc.contributor.researcheridA-7994-2018
dc.contributor.scopusid22935203300
dc.contributor.scopusid15757855500
dc.contributor.scopusid56245687600
dc.contributor.scopusid35618853300
dc.contributor.scopusid6603550418
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-25T19:35:23Z
dc.date.available2021-10-25T19:35:23Z
dc.date.issued2009-05-01
dc.description.abstractStudy Design. Randomized single-blind controlled trial. Objective. We aimed to compare the effects of epidural steroid injections and physical therapy program on pain and function in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Summary of Background Data. LSS is one of the most common degenerative spinal disorders among elderly population. Initial treatment of this disabling painful condition is usually conservative including analgesics, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, exercise, physical therapy, or epidural steroid injections. Owing to lack of sufficient data concerning the effectiveness of conservative treatment in LSS, we aimed to compare the effectiveness of epidural steroid injections and physical therapy program in a randomized controlled manner. Methods. A total of 29 patients diagnosed as LSS were randomized into 3 groups. Group 1 (n = 10) received an inpatient physical therapy program for 2 weeks, group 2 (n = 10) received epidural steroid injections, and group 3 (n = 9) served as the controls. All study patients additionally received diclofenac and a home-based exercise program. The patients were evaluated at baseline, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after treatment by finger floor distance, treadmill walk test, sit-to-stand test, weight carrying test, Roland Morris Disability Index, and Nottingham Health Profile. Results. Both epidural steroid and physical therapy groups have demonstrated significant improvement in pain and functional parameters and no significant difference was noted between the 2 treatment groups. Significant improvements were also noted in the control group. Pain and functional assessment scores (RMDI, NHP physical activity subscore) were significantly more improved in group 2 compared with controls at the second week. Conclusion. Epidural steroid injections and physical therapy both seem to be effective in LSS patients up to 6 months of follow-up.
dc.identifier.citationKoç, Z. vd. (2009). "Effectiveness of physical therapy and epidural steroid injections in lumbar spinal stenosis". Spine, 34(10), 985-989.
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819c0a6b
dc.identifier.endpage989
dc.identifier.issn0362-2436
dc.identifier.issue10
dc.identifier.pubmed19404172
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-67650311672
dc.identifier.startpage985
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819c0a6b
dc.identifier.urihttps://journals.lww.com/spinejournal/Fulltext/2009/05010/Effectiveness_of_Physical_Therapy_and_Epidural.2.aspx
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11452/22475
dc.identifier.volume34
dc.identifier.wos000265677900001
dc.indexed.wosSCIE
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkins
dc.relation.collaborationYurt içi
dc.relation.journalSpine
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectEpidural steroid injection
dc.subjectLumbar spinal stenosis
dc.subjectPhysical therapy
dc.subjectMorris-disability-questionnaire
dc.subjectNonoperative treatment
dc.subjectConservative treatment
dc.subjectExercise treadmill
dc.subjectControlled-trial
dc.subjectTurkish version
dc.subjectRadicular pain
dc.subjectInfiltration
dc.subjectPopulation
dc.subjectNeurosciences & neurology
dc.subjectOrthopedics
dc.subject.emtreeBupivacaine
dc.subject.emtreeDiclofenac
dc.subject.emtreeTriamcinolone acetonide
dc.subject.emtreeAntiinflammatory agent
dc.subject.emtreeDiclofenac
dc.subject.emtreeNonsteroid antiinflammatory agent
dc.subject.emtreeSteroid
dc.subject.emtreeAdult
dc.subject.emtreeArticle
dc.subject.emtreeClinical article
dc.subject.emtreeClinical trial
dc.subject.emtreeConservative treatment
dc.subject.emtreeControlled clinical trial
dc.subject.emtreeControlled study
dc.subject.emtreeDisability
dc.subject.emtreeExercise
dc.subject.emtreeFemale
dc.subject.emtreeFollow up
dc.subject.emtreeFunctional assessment
dc.subject.emtreeHome care
dc.subject.emtreeHuman
dc.subject.emtreeLumbar spine stenosis
dc.subject.emtreeMale
dc.subject.emtreeNottingham Health Profile
dc.subject.emtreePain
dc.subject.emtreePain assessment
dc.subject.emtreePhysiotherapy
dc.subject.emtreePriority journal
dc.subject.emtreeRating scale
dc.subject.emtreeRandomized controlled trial
dc.subject.emtreeRoland Morris disability index
dc.subject.emtreeScoring system
dc.subject.emtreeSingle blind procedure
dc.subject.emtreeStatistical significance
dc.subject.emtreeTreadmill
dc.subject.emtreeTreatment outcome
dc.subject.emtreeTreatment response
dc.subject.emtreeVertebral canal stenosis
dc.subject.emtreeAged
dc.subject.emtreeComparative study
dc.subject.emtreeDaily life activity
dc.subject.emtreeDrug effect
dc.subject.emtreeEpidural drug administration
dc.subject.emtreeFitness
dc.subject.emtreeKinesiotherapy
dc.subject.emtreeLow back pain
dc.subject.emtreeLumbar vertebra
dc.subject.emtreeMethodology
dc.subject.emtreePathology
dc.subject.emtreePathophysiology
dc.subject.emtreePatient satisfaction
dc.subject.emtreePhysiology
dc.subject.emtreeRadiography
dc.subject.emtreeStatistics
dc.subject.emtreeVertebral canal stenosis
dc.subject.emtreeMiddle aged
dc.subject.meshActivities of daily living
dc.subject.meshAged
dc.subject.meshAnti-inflammatory agents
dc.subject.meshAnti-inflammatory agents, non-steroidal
dc.subject.meshDiclofenac
dc.subject.meshExercise therapy
dc.subject.meshFemale
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshInjections, epidural
dc.subject.meshLow back pain
dc.subject.meshLumbar vertebrae
dc.subject.meshMale
dc.subject.meshMiddle aged
dc.subject.meshPatient satisfaction
dc.subject.meshPhysical fitness
dc.subject.meshPhysical therapy modalities
dc.subject.meshSingle-blind method
dc.subject.meshSpinal stenosis
dc.subject.meshSteroids
dc.subject.meshTreatment outcome
dc.subject.scopusEpidural Drug Administration; Spinal Stenosis; Radiculopathy
dc.subject.wosClinical neurology
dc.subject.wosOrthopedics
dc.titleEffectiveness of physical therapy and epidural steroid injections in lumbar spinal stenosis
dc.typeArticle
dc.wos.quartileQ1 (Orthopedics)
dc.wos.quartileQ2 (Clinical neurology)
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.departmentTıp Fakültesi/Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Ana Bilim Dalı
local.indexed.atScopus
local.indexed.atWOS

Dosyalar

Lisanslı seri

Şimdi gösteriliyor 1 - 1 / 1
Placeholder
Ad:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama