Yayın:
Aversive conditioning in honey bees (Apis mellifera anatolica): A comparison of drones and workers

dc.contributor.authorDinges, Christopher W.
dc.contributor.authorAvalos, Arian
dc.contributor.authorAbramson, Charles I.
dc.contributor.authorCraig, David Philip Arthur
dc.contributor.authorAustin, Zoe M.
dc.contributor.authorVarnon, Christopher A.
dc.contributor.buuauthorDal, Fatıma Nur
dc.contributor.buuauthorGiray, Tuğrul
dc.contributor.departmentMustafakemalpaşa Meslek Yüksekokulu
dc.contributor.departmentArıcılık Geliştirme Uygulama ve Araştırma Merkezi
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-4383-4681
dc.contributor.scopusid55903231400
dc.contributor.scopusid6602901451
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-18T12:11:10Z
dc.date.available2022-10-18T12:11:10Z
dc.date.issued2013-11
dc.description.abstractHoney bees provide a model system to elucidate the relationship between sociality and complex behaviors within the same species, as females (workers) are highly social and males (drones) are more solitary. We report on aversive learning studies in drone and worker honey bees (Apis mellifera anatolica) in escape, punishment and discriminative punishment situations. In all three experiments, a newly developed electric shock avoidance assay was used. The comparisons of expected and observed responses were performed with conventional statistical methods and a systematic randomization modeling approach called object oriented modeling. The escape experiment consisted of two measurements recorded in a master-yoked paradigm: frequency of response and latency to respond following administration of shock. Master individuals could terminate an unavoidable shock triggered by a decrementing 30 s timer by crossing the shuttlebox centerline following shock activation. Across all groups, there was large individual response variation. When assessing group response frequency and latency, master subjects performed better than yoked subjects for both workers and drones. In the punishment experiment, individuals were shocked upon entering the shock portion of a bilaterally wired shuttlebox. The shock portion was spatially static and unsignalled. Only workers effectively avoided the shock. The discriminative punishment experiment repeated the punishment experiment but included a counterbalanced blue and yellow background signal and the side of shock was manipulated. Drones correctly responded less than workers when shock was paired with blue. However, when shock was paired with yellow there was no observable difference between drones and workers.
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Science Foundation -- DBI 0552717
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Science Foundation -- 1263327
dc.identifier.citationDinges, C. W. vd. (2013). "Aversive conditioning in honey bees (Apis mellifera anatolica): A comparison of drones and workers". Journal of Experimental Biology, 216(21), 4124-4134.
dc.identifier.doi10.1242/jeb.090100
dc.identifier.endpage4134
dc.identifier.issn0022-0949
dc.identifier.issn1477-9145
dc.identifier.issue21
dc.identifier.pubmed24133154
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84886506971
dc.identifier.startpage4124
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.090100
dc.identifier.urihttps://journals.biologists.com/jeb/article/216/21/4124/11701/Aversive-conditioning-in-honey-bees-Apis-mellifera
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11452/29135
dc.identifier.volume216
dc.identifier.wos000325806300028
dc.indexed.wosSCIE
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherCompany Biologists
dc.relation.collaborationYurt dışı
dc.relation.journalJournal of Experimental Biology
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectLife sciences & biomedicine - other topics
dc.subjectHoney bees
dc.subjectDrones
dc.subjectWorkers
dc.subjectAversive conditioning
dc.subjectDivision-of-labor
dc.subjectProboscis extension
dc.subjectMushroom bodies
dc.subjectBehavioral-development
dc.subjectLearning-performance
dc.subjectVolume changes
dc.subjectBrain
dc.subjectDiscrimination
dc.subjectMechanisms
dc.subjectPlasticity
dc.subjectAversive conditioning
dc.subject.emtreeAnimal
dc.subject.emtreeArticle
dc.subject.emtreeAversion conditioning
dc.subject.emtreeAvoidance behavior
dc.subject.emtreeBee
dc.subject.emtreeComparative study
dc.subject.emtreeConditioning
dc.subject.emtreeDrone
dc.subject.emtreeEscape behavior
dc.subject.emtreeFemale
dc.subject.emtreeHoneybee
dc.subject.emtreeMale
dc.subject.emtreePhysiology
dc.subject.emtreePunishment
dc.subject.emtreeTurkey (republic)
dc.subject.emtreeWorkers
dc.subject.meshAnimals
dc.subject.meshAvoidance learning
dc.subject.meshBees
dc.subject.meshConditioning (psychology)
dc.subject.meshEscape reaction
dc.subject.meshFemale
dc.subject.meshMale
dc.subject.meshPunishment
dc.subject.meshTurkey
dc.subject.scopusAnimals; Honeybee; Apis Mellifera
dc.subject.wosBiology
dc.titleAversive conditioning in honey bees (Apis mellifera anatolica): A comparison of drones and workers
dc.typeArticle
dc.wos.quartileQ1
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.departmentMustafakemalpaşa Meslek Yüksekokulu/Arıcılık Geliştirme Uygulama ve Araştırma Merkezi
local.indexed.atScopus
local.indexed.atWOS

Dosyalar

Lisanslı seri

Şimdi gösteriliyor 1 - 1 / 1
Placeholder
Ad:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama