Yayın:
Esthesioneuroblastoma: Is there a need for elective neck treatment?

dc.contributor.authorDemiröz, C.
dc.contributor.authorGutfeld, O.
dc.contributor.authorAboziada, M.
dc.contributor.authorBrown, D.
dc.contributor.authorMarentette, L.J.
dc.contributor.authorEisbruch, A.
dc.contributor.buuauthorDEMİRÖZ ABAKAY, CANDAN
dc.contributor.departmentTıp Fakültesi
dc.contributor.departmentRadyasyon Onkolojisi Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.contributor.scopusid35113034100
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-13T10:19:14Z
dc.date.issued2011-11-15
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To assess the risk of cervical lymph node metastases after definitive treatment for esthesioneuroblastoma (ENB) that did not include elective neck therapy. Methods and Materials: This was a retrospective analysis of 26 ENB patients treated at the University of Michigan between 1995 and 2007. Tumor stage was Kadish A in 1 patient, B in 19, C in 5, and unknown in 1. Craniofacial or subcranial resection was performed in 24 patients (92%), with negative margins in 22 (92%). Postoperative radiotherapy (RT) to the primary site was given in 12 patients (46%), and 14 patients (54%) had surgery alone. All patients had clinically N0 disease, and no patient underwent elective neck dissection or radiation. Median follow-up was 72 months. Results: Local relapse-free survival was significantly better for patients who received postoperative RT compared with those who had surgery alone: 100% vs. 29% at 5 years, respectively (p = 0.005). Five-year disease-free survival was 87.5% in the RT group vs. 31% in the surgery-alone group (p = 0.05). Regional failure was observed in 7 patients (27%), 6 with Kadish Stage B and 1 with Stage C disease. The most common site of nodal failure was Level II, and 3 patients failed in the contralateral neck. Only 3 patients with regional failure were successfully salvaged. Conclusion: The high rate of regional failures when the neck is not electively treated justifies elective nodal RT in patients with both Kadish Stages B and C. In addition, our experience confirms the beneficial effect on local control of adjuvant RT to the tumor bed. © 2011 Elsevier Inc.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.03.036
dc.identifier.endpage e261
dc.identifier.issn0360-3016
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-80255123306
dc.identifier.startpagee255
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11452/52575
dc.identifier.volume81
dc.indexed.scopusScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.journalInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectSubcranial resection
dc.subjectOlfactory neuroblastoma
dc.subjectEsthesioneuroblastoma
dc.subjectElective neck irradiation
dc.subjectCraniofacial resection
dc.subject.scopusOlfactory Neuroblastoma: Diagnosis and Treatment Insights
dc.titleEsthesioneuroblastoma: Is there a need for elective neck treatment?
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.departmentTıp Fakültesi/ Radyasyon Onkolojisi Ana Bilim Dalı
local.indexed.atScopus
relation.isAuthorOfPublication42e5fe2e-88cd-4083-9ed8-28b4cfa73e9d
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery42e5fe2e-88cd-4083-9ed8-28b4cfa73e9d

Dosyalar