Publication:
Analysis of the fracture morphology of polyamide, polyester, polypropylene, and silk sutures before and after implantation in vivo

dc.contributor.buuauthorKaraca, Esra
dc.contributor.buuauthorHockenberger, Aslı Şengönül
dc.contributor.departmentMühendislik Fakültesi
dc.contributor.departmentTekstil Mühendisliği Bölümü
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-1777-3977
dc.contributor.researcheridAAS-8480-2020
dc.contributor.researcheridGWA-4691-2022
dc.contributor.scopusid17344029200
dc.contributor.scopusid6507435813
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-07T11:02:28Z
dc.date.available2024-03-07T11:02:28Z
dc.date.issued2008-11
dc.description.abstractThis study has analyzed fracture morphology of four nonabsorbable commercially available sutures before and after implantation in rats. Also, tensile and knot strength retention have been evaluated after 3 and 8 weeks in vivo. Scanning electron and optical light microscopes were used for analysis of fracture morphologies and surface changes of the sutures. A clear effect of in vivo on the tensile and knot strength changes, and the fracture mechanism was seen for braided sutures. The suture size was also important for braided sutures, as fibrous tissue formation plays an important role in terms of the size. The fiber's surface properties were also important for the fracture morphology. A smooth and even surface was not suitable for the fibrous tissue formation as seen in monofilament sutures. Therefore, the polymer type was very important for the monofilament sutures, as it was the most important parameter to determine the fracture morphology and was not affected by the implantation and the implantation time. The size of the suture was also important for the polypropylene in terms of axial splitting before and after implantation. This, however, was not the case for knot strength tests. The knot was undone regardless of the size. Surface characteristics were very important for braided sutures, as they have a rough surface that supports tissue formation on the fracture mechanism, tensile and knot strength. Silk suture has single filaments with no regular diameter and smooth surface. Therefore, silk suture has more tissue formation postimplantation compared to polyester suture.
dc.identifier.citationKaraca, E. ve Hockenberger, A.S. (2008). "Analysis of the fracture morphology of polyamide, polyester, polypropylene,and silk sutures before and after implantation in vivo". Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials, 87B(2), 580-589.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.31136
dc.identifier.endpage589
dc.identifier.issn1552-4973
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.pubmed18506829
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-55049137127
dc.identifier.startpage580
dc.identifier.urihttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/jbm.b.31136
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11452/40266
dc.identifier.volume87B
dc.identifier.wos000260355000034
dc.indexed.scopusScopus
dc.indexed.wosSCIE
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.journalJournal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterial
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectAnatomy
dc.subjectAnimal fibers
dc.subjectFracture
dc.subjectMicroscopes
dc.subjectOptical instruments
dc.subjectPolyamides
dc.subjectPolyesters
dc.subjectPolypropylene
dc.subjectScanning electron microscopy
dc.subjectThermoplastics
dc.subjectABS resins
dc.subjectFracture
dc.subjectMorphology
dc.subjectPlastic products
dc.subjectPolymers
dc.subjectSilk
dc.subjectThermoplastics
dc.subjectFracture morphology
dc.subjectIn vivo
dc.subjectNonabsorbable
dc.subjectStrength loss
dc.subjectSurface properties
dc.subjectFracture morphology
dc.subjectIn vivo
dc.subjectNonabsorbable
dc.subjectStrength loss
dc.subjectSuture
dc.subjectKnot performance
dc.subjectMechanical-properties
dc.subjectTensile properties
dc.subjectResistance
dc.subjectinfection
dc.subjectStrength
dc.subjectBehavior
dc.subjectRats
dc.subjectEngineering
dc.subjectMaterials science
dc.subject.emtreePolyamide
dc.subject.emtreePolyester
dc.subject.emtreePolypropylene
dc.subject.emtreeAnimal experiment
dc.subject.emtreeFibrous tissue formation
dc.subject.emtreeImplantation
dc.subject.emtreeKnot strength
dc.subject.emtreeMicroscope
dc.subject.emtreeNonhuman
dc.subject.emtreeOptical light microscope
dc.subject.emtreeRat
dc.subject.emtreeReview
dc.subject.emtreeScanning electron microscope
dc.subject.emtreeSilk
dc.subject.emtreeStrength
dc.subject.emtreeSurface property
dc.subject.emtreeSuture
dc.subject.emtreeTensile strength
dc.subject.emtreeTissue
dc.subject.meshAnimals
dc.subject.meshBombyx
dc.subject.meshNylons
dc.subject.meshPolyesters
dc.subject.meshPolypropylenes
dc.subject.meshRats
dc.subject.meshSilk
dc.subject.meshSurface properties
dc.subject.meshSuture techniques
dc.subject.meshSutures
dc.subject.meshTensile strength
dc.subject.scopusKnots; Sutures; Tying
dc.subject.wosEngineering, biomedical
dc.subject.wosMaterials science, biomaterials
dc.titleAnalysis of the fracture morphology of polyamide, polyester, polypropylene, and silk sutures before and after implantation in vivo
dc.typeArticle
dc.wos.quartileN/A
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.departmentMühendislik Fakültesi/Tekstil Mühendisliği Bölümü
local.indexed.atPubMed
local.indexed.atWOS
local.indexed.atScopus

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Placeholder
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: