Yayın:
Consumers’ willingness to pay for geographical origin labels: Evidence from the Turkish table olive

dc.contributor.authorÖzkan, Gülay
dc.contributor.authorGürbüz, İsmail Bülent
dc.contributor.buuauthorÖzkan, Gülay
dc.contributor.buuauthorGÜRBÜZ, İSMAİL BÜLENT
dc.contributor.departmentZiraat Fakültesi
dc.contributor.departmentTarım Ekonomisi Bölümü
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-6878-1673
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-5340-3725
dc.contributor.scopusid57208320149
dc.contributor.scopusid57194013312
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-13T06:26:54Z
dc.date.issued2023-01-01
dc.description.abstractBackground and aim: A geographical indication (GI) confirms the products’ geographical origin. GI products derive their quality and reputation from this origin. Protected Designation of Origin (PDO) labelling guarantees that the product is produced, processed and prepared in a specific geographical area. PDO labelling helps sustain the product’s naturalness and quality by preserving local identity and culture. Therefore, consumers are willing to pay (WTP) more for such products. PDO labelling elevates brand building and supports rural tourism and rural development. Olive producers can reach a high-profit margin by obtaining PDO labels. Despite the benefits, PDO labelling offers PDO-labelled table olive consumption below desired levels. This shows that consumers still need to understand PDO labelling fully. This research aims to reveal consumers’ GI knowledge of the Gemlik table olive and how their knowledge affects consumption levels and WTP. Methods: Data was collected from 648 residents in Bursa, Turkey using a public-intercept survey. The study used descriptive analysis and used SPSS 22 software package to analyse the data. Results: The result showed that 59.6% of participants were knowledgeable about GIs, and 56.3% were knowledgeable about PDO labelled Gemlik olive. Only 37.5% of respondents consumed PDO labelled food products, and 32.7% consumed PDO labelled Gemlik olive. Over half (51.4%) of the participants see themselves as average, 31.8% moderately, and 16.8% very knowledgeable about olives. While 79% of the consumers indicated WTP for the PDO label, half could pay 10% or less. The proportion of those who said they could spend more than 25% remained at 11%. Conclusion: Consumers are willing to pay more for PDO labelled Gemlik olives as their knowledge increases.
dc.identifier.doi10.23751/pn.v25i2.13380
dc.identifier.issn1129-8723
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85165211650
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11452/51602
dc.identifier.volume25
dc.indexed.scopusScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMattioli 1885
dc.relation.journalProgress in Nutrition
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectMarketing orientation
dc.subjectGeographical indication
dc.subjectEco-labels
dc.subjectConsumers’ knowledge
dc.subjectConsumer intentions
dc.subject.scopusDesignation of Origin; Rural Development; Intellectual Property Right
dc.titleConsumers’ willingness to pay for geographical origin labels: Evidence from the Turkish table olive
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.departmentZiraat Fakültesi/Tarım Ekonomisi Bölümü
local.indexed.atScopus
relation.isAuthorOfPublication887b7c70-d321-4ad6-8c91-76fc749df9d8
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery887b7c70-d321-4ad6-8c91-76fc749df9d8

Dosyalar