Yayın:
Parameter significance in exergy destruction: Comparative analysis of working fluid and temperature effects in low-temperature geothermal energy conversion

dc.contributor.buuauthorYÜCE, BAHADIR ERMAN
dc.contributor.buuauthorARSLANOĞLU, NURULLAH
dc.contributor.departmentMühendislik Fakültesi
dc.contributor.departmentMakine Mühendisliği Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.contributor.researcheridAAH-7816-2021
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-02T19:28:29Z
dc.date.issued2025-01-01
dc.description.abstractbahadiryuce@uludag.edu.tr This study analyzed the effect of the refrigerant type selection, condenser and evaporator temperatures on thermal efficiency, network output, second-law efficiency, and exergy destruction values obtained with an advanced approach to exergy analysis. The thermal source was considered a low-temperature geothermal resource at 90 degrees C. The refrigerants R11, R123, and R245ca were used as a working fluid. The evaporator and condenser temperatures investigated were 76 degrees C, 80 degrees C, 84 degrees C, and 26 degrees C, 31 degrees C, and 36 degrees C, respectively. Firstly, the thermodynamic aspects were validated by using the literature study. Then, the L27 orthogonal array was created, and further the Taguchi method was applied to objectives. The ranking order of parameters and optimum cases were obtained by calculating signal-to-noise (S/N) ratios. Subsequently, the ANOVA method was applied, yielding satisfactory R2 values and allowing for the determination of the impact ratios of the parameters. Because of the diverse nature of objectives, the contribution ratios of parameters have different values. The contribution ratio results showed that the working fluid is the most important and dominant parameter for net work output (95.1%) and endogenous (97%), avoidable (97.6%), and unavoidable (95%) exergy destructions. Alternatively, the condenser temperature is the most important parameter for thermal efficiency (66.6%), second-law efficiency (66.6%), and exogenous exergy destruction (62.2%). The results showed the rank order of the parameters and the contribution ratio values are largely compatible.
dc.identifier.doi10.1615/HeatTransRes.2024054956
dc.identifier.endpage74
dc.identifier.issn1064-2285
dc.identifier.issue5
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-86000574373
dc.identifier.startpage51
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11452/55321
dc.identifier.volume56
dc.identifier.wos001438300300004
dc.indexed.wosWOS.SCI
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherBegell House Inc
dc.relation.journalHeat transfer research
dc.subjectOrganic rankine-cycle
dc.subjectDistrict-heating systems
dc.subjectTaguchi
dc.subjectPower
dc.subjectOptimization
dc.subjectOrc
dc.subjectAnova
dc.subjectOrganic rankine cycle
dc.subjectAdvanced exergy analysis
dc.subjectScience & Technology
dc.subjectPhysical Sciences
dc.subjectThermodynamics
dc.subjectThermodynamics
dc.titleParameter significance in exergy destruction: Comparative analysis of working fluid and temperature effects in low-temperature geothermal energy conversion
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.departmentMühendislik Fakültesi/Makine Mühendisliği Ana Bilim Dalı
local.indexed.atWOS
local.indexed.atScopus
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationa89ac5c3-258a-4aec-9598-10544e8dc61c
relation.isAuthorOfPublicatione4b32f7f-3d4a-4ebf-a8b5-7bbf2e7fcf3c
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoverya89ac5c3-258a-4aec-9598-10544e8dc61c

Dosyalar