Publication:
A colony defence difference between two honey bee subspecies (Apis mellifera cypria and Apis mellifera cacasica)

dc.contributor.authorKandemir, İrfan
dc.contributor.authorAbramson, Charles I.
dc.contributor.authorSerrano, Eddie
dc.contributor.authorSong, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorWells, Harrington
dc.contributor.buuauthorÇakmak, İbrahim
dc.contributor.buuauthorÇakmak, Selvinar S.
dc.contributor.buuauthorAydın, Levent
dc.contributor.departmentMustafa Kemal Paşa Yüksekokulu
dc.contributor.departmentVeterinerlik Fakültesi
dc.contributor.departmentArıcılık Geliştirme ve Araştırma Merkezi
dc.contributor.departmentArıcılığı Geliştirme Uygulama ve Araştırma Merkezi
dc.contributor.researcheridAAH-2558-2021
dc.contributor.scopusid57207796431
dc.contributor.scopusid55184998300
dc.contributor.scopusid55808198600
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-09T06:36:52Z
dc.date.available2022-05-09T06:36:52Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.description.abstractColony defence differences between two honey bee subspecies Apis mellifera cypria and A. m. caucasica are reported. A. m. cypria formed significantly (P < 0.001) more defensive balls of bees covering intruders than A. m. caucasica in response to a predatory wasp attack. Although there were differences in ball formation, the number of bees attacking the wasp did not differ in the balls that were formed (P > 0.10). In addition to ball formation, A. m. cypria was tested for differences in frequency of attacking, shaking, shimmering, line formation and lunging when confronted with a live tethered wasp, dead tethered wasp or just the tethering line. Only the dead wasp elicited differential response. It is suggested that these difference in anti-predator behaviour are related to the high predation risks of A. m. cyrpria. Caucasian bees and their hybrids do not face to such wasp predation due to the cool weather in the Caucasus region.
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Science Foundation (NSF) - DBI 0552717
dc.identifier.citationKandemir, İ. vd. (2012). "A colony defence difference between two honey bee subspecies (Apis mellifera cypria and Apis mellifera cacasica)". Journal of Apicultural Research, 51(2), 169-173.
dc.identifier.endpage173
dc.identifier.issn0021-8839
dc.identifier.issn2078-6913
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84859779059
dc.identifier.startpage169
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3896/IBRA.1.51.2.04
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.3896/IBRA.1.51.2.04
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11452/26306
dc.identifier.volume51
dc.identifier.wos000302295500004
dc.indexed.wosSCIE
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis
dc.relation.collaborationYurt içi
dc.relation.collaborationYurt dışı
dc.relation.journalJournal of Apicultural Research
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectEntomology
dc.subjectHoney bee subspecies
dc.subjectColony defence behaviour
dc.subjectVespa orientalis
dc.subjectBall formation
dc.subjectBehavior
dc.subjectHornet
dc.subjectPredator
dc.subjectCerana
dc.subjectApis mellifera
dc.subjectApis mellifera caucasica
dc.subjectApis mellifera cypria
dc.subjectApoidea
dc.subjectCypria
dc.subject.scopusVespa Velutina; Vespula Germanica; Vespidae
dc.subject.wosEntomology
dc.titleA colony defence difference between two honey bee subspecies (Apis mellifera cypria and Apis mellifera cacasica)
dc.typeArticle
dc.wos.quartileQ1
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.departmentMustafa Kemal Paşa Yüksekokulu/Arıcılığı Geliştirme Uygulama ve Araştırma Merkezi
local.contributor.departmentVeterinerlik Fakültesi/Arıcılık Geliştirme ve Araştırma Merkezi
local.indexed.atScopus
local.indexed.atWOS

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Placeholder
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: