Yayın:
Nationwide assessment of pulmonary function testing practices and safety compliance during the COVID-19 pandemic

dc.contributor.authorDilektasli, Asli Gorek
dc.contributor.authorBorekci, Sermin
dc.contributor.authorYildiz, Oznur Akkoca
dc.contributor.authorGemicioglu, Bilun
dc.contributor.authorSalturk, Cuneyt
dc.contributor.authorSaryal, Sevgi Behiye
dc.contributor.authorUlubay, Gaye
dc.contributor.buuauthorGÖREK DİLEKTAŞLI, ASLI
dc.contributor.departmentTıp Fakültesi
dc.contributor.departmentGöğüs Hastalıkları Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.contributor.researcheridLXV-3809-2024
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-21T09:32:56Z
dc.date.issued2025-05-01
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) presented considerable challenges to health services, particularly for a routine assessment method, the pulmonary function tests (PFTs), which can generate aerosols and require sharing common surfaces. Despite these risks, there is a need to continue testing, especially for vulnerable patient groups. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An online survey was conducted from June 1 to June 26, 2020, to assess pulmonologists' practices regarding PFTs before and during the pandemic's first peak in T & uuml;rkiye (March 11-May 20, 2020). The survey included 30 anonymized questions and received ethical committee approval. Statistical analysis was performed using the IBM Statistical Package for the Social RESULTS: Two hundred and forty-three respondents across 59 cities participated in the study. 93% were pulmonologists. 77.4% of PFT labs have adequate ventilation by having a window enabling room direct air exchange. 27.2% of the PFT labs continued testing during the first peak of the pandemic. 83.3% of the responding centers applied triage before testing. Ongoing tests included spirometry (100%), bronchodilator reversibility testing (62.1%), and carbon-monoxide diffusion testing (16.7%). 49% of the PFT labs conducted fewer than four tests daily, while 21.2% performed more than eight. PFT technicians used personal protective equipment, with 67.7% using eye protection and 75.3 % wearing FFP3 or FFP2 masks. CONCLUSION: The survey found that pulmonologists have acted quickly and made moderate success in making preparations in PFT labs for the COVID-19 pandemic. Nevertheless, safer practice in PFT units still needs to be implemented.
dc.identifier.doi10.4274/ThoracResPract.2025.2025-1-12
dc.identifier.endpage144
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105006920894
dc.identifier.startpage137
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4274/ThoracResPract.2025.2025-1-12
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11452/56076
dc.identifier.volume26
dc.identifier.wos001482756700001
dc.indexed.wosWOS.ESCI
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherGalenos Publishing House
dc.relation.journalThoracic Research and Practice
dc.subjectThoracic society
dc.subjectSpirometry
dc.subjectPulmonary function testing
dc.subjectCOVID-19
dc.subjectRespiratory system
dc.subjectOccupational safety
dc.subjectScience & Technology
dc.subjectLife Sciences & Biomedicine
dc.titleNationwide assessment of pulmonary function testing practices and safety compliance during the COVID-19 pandemic
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.departmentTıp Fakültesi/Göğüs Hastalıkları Ana Bilim Dalı
local.indexed.atWOS
local.indexed.atScopus
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationa71bfd48-897b-4983-87e7-11edc5ed438a
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoverya71bfd48-897b-4983-87e7-11edc5ed438a

Dosyalar

Orijinal seri

Şimdi gösteriliyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
Ad:
Dilektasli_2025.pdf
Boyut:
261.42 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format