Yayın: Empirical cefepime plus vancomycin versus ceftazidime plus vancomycin versus meropenem plus vancomycin in the treatment of healthcare-associated meningitis: Results of the multicenter ephesus study
| dc.contributor.author | Sipahi, Oğuz Reşat | |
| dc.contributor.author | Akyol, Deniz | |
| dc.contributor.author | Örmen, Bahar | |
| dc.contributor.author | Çiçek-Şentürk, Gönül | |
| dc.contributor.author | Mermer, Sinan | |
| dc.contributor.author | Amer, Fatma | |
| dc.contributor.author | Saed, Maysaa Abdallah | |
| dc.contributor.author | Özdemir, Kevser | |
| dc.contributor.author | Tükenmez-Tigen, Elif | |
| dc.contributor.author | Altin, Ümmügülsüm | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kurtaran, Behice | |
| dc.contributor.author | Popescu, Corneliu Petru | |
| dc.contributor.author | Sakcı, Mustafa | |
| dc.contributor.author | Suntur, Bedia Mutay | |
| dc.contributor.author | Gautam, Vikas | |
| dc.contributor.author | Sharma, Megha | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kaya, Şafak | |
| dc.contributor.author | Akçil, Eren Fatma | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kaya, Selçuk | |
| dc.contributor.author | Turunç, Tuba | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ergen, Pınar | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kandemir, Özlem | |
| dc.contributor.author | Cesur, Salih | |
| dc.contributor.author | Bardak-Özcem, Selin | |
| dc.contributor.author | Özgiray, Erkin | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yurtseven, Taşkın | |
| dc.contributor.author | Erdem, Hüseyin Aytaç | |
| dc.contributor.author | Sipahi, Hilal | |
| dc.contributor.author | Arda, Bilgin | |
| dc.contributor.author | Pullukçu, Hüsnü | |
| dc.contributor.author | Taşbakan, Meltem | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yamazhan, Tansu | |
| dc.contributor.author | Aydemir,Şöhret | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ulusoy, Sercan | |
| dc.contributor.buuauthor | Öztoprak, Nefise | |
| dc.contributor.buuauthor | Önal, Uğur | |
| dc.contributor.buuauthor | ÖNAL, UĞUR | |
| dc.contributor.department | Tıp Fakültesi | |
| dc.contributor.department | Tıbbi Mikrobiyoloji Ana Bilim Dalı | |
| dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0001-6194-3254 | |
| dc.contributor.researcherid | DLV-1003-2022 | |
| dc.contributor.researcherid | JCO-3678-2023 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-12-03T05:24:48Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-12-03T05:24:48Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2023-09-28 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Background Herein, we analyzed the efficacy of main antibiotic therapy regimens in the treatment of healthcare-associated meningitis (HCAM).Materials/methods This retrospective cohort study was conducted in 18 tertiary-care academic hospitals Turkey, India, Egypt and Romania. We extracted data and outcomes of all patients with post-neurosurgical meningitis cases fulfilling the study inclusion criteria and treated with empirical therapy between December 2006-September 2018.Results Twenty patients in the cefepime + vancomycin-(CV) group, 31 patients in the ceftazidime + vancomycin-(CFV) group, and 119 patients in the meropenem + vancomycin-(MV) group met the inclusion criteria. The MV subgroup had a significantly higher mean Glasgow Coma Score, a higher rate of admission to the intensive care unit within the previous month, and a higher rate of antibiot herapy within the previous month before the meningitis episode (p < 0.05). Microbiological success on Day 3-5, end of treatment (EOT) clinical success (80% vs. 54.8%% vs 57.9%), and overall success (EOT success followed by one-month survival without relapse or reinfection 65% vs. 51.6% vs. 45.3%), EOT all cause mortality (ACM) and day 30 ACM (15% vs. 22.6% vs. 26%) did not differ significantly (p > 0.05) among the three cohorts. No regimen was effective against carbapenem-resistant bacteria, and vancomycin resulted in an EOT clinical success rate of 60.6% in the methicillin-resistant staphylococci or ampicillin-resistant enterococci subgroup (n = 34).Conclusions Our study showed no significant difference in terms of clinical success and mortality among the three treatment options. All regimens were ineffective against carbapenem-resistant bacteria. Vancomycin was unsuccessful in approximately 40% of cases involving methicillin-resistant staphylococci or ampicillin-resistant enterococci. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1186/s12879-023-08596-z | |
| dc.identifier.issue | 1 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85172827939 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-023-08596-z | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11452/48788 | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 23 | |
| dc.identifier.wos | 001078643300003 | |
| dc.indexed.wos | WOS.SCI | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Bmc | |
| dc.relation.journal | Bmc Infectious Diseases | |
| dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi | |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
| dc.subject | Nosocomial bacterial-meningitis | |
| dc.subject | Resistant staphylococcus-aureus | |
| dc.subject | Practice guidelines | |
| dc.subject | Clinical-features | |
| dc.subject | Management | |
| dc.subject | Adults | |
| dc.subject | Ventriculitis | |
| dc.subject | Series | |
| dc.subject | Healthcare-associated meningitis | |
| dc.subject | Empirical therapy | |
| dc.subject | Multicenter study | |
| dc.subject | Glycopeptides | |
| dc.subject | Antibiotics | |
| dc.subject | Science & technology | |
| dc.subject | Life sciences & biomedicine | |
| dc.subject | Infectious diseases | |
| dc.title | Empirical cefepime plus vancomycin versus ceftazidime plus vancomycin versus meropenem plus vancomycin in the treatment of healthcare-associated meningitis: Results of the multicenter ephesus study | |
| dc.type | Article | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| local.contributor.department | Tıp Fakültesi/Tıbbi Mikrobiyoloji Ana Bilim Dalı | |
| local.indexed.at | WOS | |
| local.indexed.at | Scopus | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication | 73351d49-e518-4e6a-8f69-c922f8f24611 | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | 73351d49-e518-4e6a-8f69-c922f8f24611 |
Dosyalar
Orijinal seri
1 - 1 / 1
