Yayın:
The effectiveness of the low-power laser and kinesiotaping in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome, a pilot study

dc.contributor.authorGüner, Altuğ
dc.contributor.authorAksoy, Meliha Kasapoğlu
dc.contributor.buuauthorAltan, Lale
dc.contributor.departmentTıp Fakültesi
dc.contributor.departmentFiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.contributor.researcheridAAH-1652-2021
dc.contributor.scopusid6603281363
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-27T06:34:24Z
dc.date.available2024-03-27T06:34:24Z
dc.date.issued2018-05
dc.description.abstractIn mild and moderate cases of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), the conservative approach is suggested. The purpose of this study is to assess and compare the effect of low-power laser versus the combination of low-power laser and kinesiotaping on pain, muscle strength, functionality, and electrophysiologic parameters in the patients with CTS. The study was planned as single-blind, prospective, randomized control. 64 hands diagnosed with CTS were included in the study. The patients were randomly divided into three groups by closed envelope method. Low-power laser therapy was applied to Group 1 (21 hands), kinesiotaping and low-power laser therapy in group 2 (22 hands), sham laser therapy in Group 3 (21 hands). All patients were assessed by visual numeric pain scale (VNS), hand grip strength (HGS), finger pinch strength (FPS), the Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (BCTSQ), before treatment, after treatment (3rd week), and after (12th week) 3 months the treatment with the same physician. Motor and sensory nerve conduction studies were performed with electroneuromyography (ENMG) before the treatment (0th week) and at the end of the 12th week. Comparison of the group 1 with the group 3 showed significantly better improvement in the former in VNS, BCTSQ at 3rd week and 12th week compared to 0th week, and in FPS and HGS at 3rd week. Comparison of the group 2 with the group 3 showed significantly better improvement in the former VNS, BCTSQ, FPS and HGS at 3rd and 12th week compared to 0th week. When Group 1 and Group 2 were compared there was no statistically significant difference in any parameters in the 3rd week, but there was a statistically significant difference in favor of group 2 in FPS and HGS parameters at the 12th week. We have found that the kinesiotaping method applied with low-power laser treatment does not provide any additional benefit to the low-power laser treatment in the short term, however, in the long term, the increase in the HGS and FPS has occurred. In conclusion, low-power laser and kinesiotaping method in the treatment of CTS may be an effective and reliable treatment option in clinical parameters.
dc.identifier.citationGüner, A. vd. (2018). ''The effectiveness of the low-power laser and kinesiotaping in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome, a pilot study''. Rheumatology International, 38(5), 895-904.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00296-018-4020-6
dc.identifier.endpage904
dc.identifier.issn0172-8172
dc.identifier.issn1437-160X
dc.identifier.issue5
dc.identifier.pubmed29594333
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85044474668
dc.identifier.startpage895
dc.identifier.urihttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00296-018-4020-6
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11452/40631
dc.identifier.volume38
dc.identifier.wos000430547600021
dc.indexed.scopusScopus
dc.indexed.wosSCIE
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.collaborationSanayi
dc.relation.journalRheumatology International
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectRheumatology
dc.subjectCarpal tunnel syndrome
dc.subjectLow-power laser
dc.subjectKinesiotaping
dc.subjectNerve
dc.subjectStrength
dc.subjectReliability
dc.subjectTherapy
dc.subjectGrip
dc.subjectRat
dc.subject.emtreeAdult
dc.subject.emtreeArticle
dc.subject.emtreeBoston carpal tunnel syndrome questionnaire
dc.subject.emtreeCarpal tunnel questionnaire
dc.subject.emtreeCarpal tunnel syndrome
dc.subject.emtreeClinical assessment
dc.subject.emtreeClinical effectiveness
dc.subject.emtreeComparative study
dc.subject.emtreeControlled study
dc.subject.emtreeElectromyography
dc.subject.emtreeElectroneurography
dc.subject.emtreeErythema
dc.subject.emtreeFemale
dc.subject.emtreeFunctional status
dc.subject.emtreeGrip strength
dc.subject.emtreeHand grip
dc.subject.emtreeHuman
dc.subject.emtreeKinesiotaping
dc.subject.emtreeLow level laser therapy
dc.subject.emtreeMajor clinical study
dc.subject.emtreeMale
dc.subject.emtreeMiddle aged
dc.subject.emtreeMotor nerve conduction
dc.subject.emtreeMuscle strength
dc.subject.emtreeNumeric rating scale
dc.subject.emtreeOutcome assessment
dc.subject.emtreePain
dc.subject.emtreePain assessment
dc.subject.emtreePilot study
dc.subject.emtreePinch strength
dc.subject.emtreePriority journal
dc.subject.emtreeProspective study
dc.subject.emtreePruritus
dc.subject.emtreeQuality of life
dc.subject.emtreeRandomized controlled trial
dc.subject.emtreeSensory nerve conduction
dc.subject.emtreeSingle blind procedure
dc.subject.emtreeSkin irritation
dc.subject.emtreeStatistical significance
dc.subject.emtreeAdverse device effect
dc.subject.emtreeAthletic tape
dc.subject.emtreeCarpal tunnel syndrome
dc.subject.emtreeConvalescence
dc.subject.emtreeDevices
dc.subject.emtreeDiode laser
dc.subject.emtreeDrug therapy
dc.subject.emtreeLow level laser therapy
dc.subject.emtreeMultimodality cancer therapy
dc.subject.emtreeNerve conduction
dc.subject.emtreeNeurologic examination
dc.subject.emtreePain measurement
dc.subject.emtreePathophysiology
dc.subject.emtreeTime factor
dc.subject.emtreeTreatment outcome
dc.subject.emtreeTurkey (bird)
dc.subject.meshAdult
dc.subject.meshAthletic tape
dc.subject.meshCarpal tunnel syndrome
dc.subject.meshCombined modality therapy
dc.subject.meshFemale
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshLasers, semiconductor
dc.subject.meshLow-level light therapy
dc.subject.meshMale
dc.subject.meshMiddle aged
dc.subject.meshNeural conduction
dc.subject.meshNeurologic examination
dc.subject.meshPain measurement
dc.subject.meshPilot projects
dc.subject.meshPinch strength
dc.subject.meshProspective studies
dc.subject.meshRecovery of function
dc.subject.meshSingle-blind method
dc.subject.meshTime factors
dc.subject.meshTreatment outcome
dc.subject.meshTurkey
dc.subject.scopusAthletic Tape; Low Back Pain; Randomized Controlled Trial
dc.subject.wosRheumatology
dc.titleThe effectiveness of the low-power laser and kinesiotaping in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome, a pilot study
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.departmentTıp Fakültesi/Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Ana Bilim Dalı
local.indexed.atPubMed
local.indexed.atScopus

Dosyalar

Lisanslı seri

Şimdi gösteriliyor 1 - 1 / 1
Placeholder
Ad:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama