Yayın:
Comparison of parallel and counter flow coil absorber performance

dc.contributor.buuauthorKaynaklı, O.
dc.contributor.buuauthorHoroz, İlhami
dc.contributor.departmentMühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi
dc.contributor.departmentMakine Mühendisliği Bölümü
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-5519-8136
dc.contributor.researcheridAAG-5647-2019
dc.contributor.scopusid8387145900
dc.contributor.scopusid6603449998
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-29T11:40:14Z
dc.date.available2021-12-29T11:40:14Z
dc.date.issued2006-02
dc.description.abstractThis study concentrates on the absorber used in the vapor absorption systems using water-lithium bromide solution with water as the refrigerant and investigates the simultaneously occurred heat and mass transfer during the absorption process. The heat and mass transfer equations were applied to simulate this process and solved using a computer program written in Delphi 7 for the parallel and counter flow absorbers. The simulation results were compared with the results of the past studies. The solution and cooling water temperatures, the overall heat transfer coefficient, the heat transferred and the mass absorbed were calculated for the parallel and counter flow absorbers. It is concluded that the counter flow absorber presents better performance for all conditions. For smaller number of coils, the difference is smaller, however if the number of coils is bigger, the counter flow absorber presents much better performance than the parallel flow absorber. When the number of coils is 20 and 120, the counter (low absorber provides 1.7% and 26% higher heat and mass transfer than the parallel flow absorber respectively.
dc.identifier.citationKaynaklı, O. ve Horoz, İ. (2006). ''Comparison of parallel and counter flow coil absorber performance''. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 33(2), 211-223.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2005.09.005
dc.identifier.endpage223
dc.identifier.issn0735-1933
dc.identifier.issn1879-0178
dc.identifier.issnhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735193305001752
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-32044440538
dc.identifier.startpage211
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2005.09.005
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11452/23734
dc.identifier.volume33
dc.identifier.wos000235564500010
dc.indexed.wosSCIE
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherPergamon-Elsevier
dc.relation.journalInternational Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectThermodynamics
dc.subjectMechanics
dc.subjectParallel flow
dc.subjectHeat and mass transfer
dc.subjectCounter flow
dc.subjectCoil absorber
dc.subjectAbsorption
dc.subjectWater absorption
dc.subjectRefrigeration
dc.subjectRefrigerants
dc.subjectMathematical models
dc.subjectMass transfer
dc.subjectLithium compounds
dc.subjectFlow of fluids
dc.subjectComputer simulation
dc.subjectHeat transfer
dc.subject.scopusAbsorption Refrigeration; Solar Cooling; Lithium Bromide
dc.subject.wosThermodynamics
dc.subject.wosMechanics
dc.titleComparison of parallel and counter flow coil absorber performance
dc.typeArticle
dc.wos.quartileQ3
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.departmentMühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi/Makine Mühendisliği Bölümü
local.indexed.atScopus
local.indexed.atWOS

Dosyalar

Lisanslı seri

Şimdi gösteriliyor 1 - 1 / 1
Placeholder
Ad:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama