Publication:
Downscaling wave energy converters for optimum performance in low-energy seas

dc.contributor.authorIglesias, Gregorio
dc.contributor.buuauthorMajidi, AjabGul
dc.contributor.buuauthorBingolbali, Bilal
dc.contributor.buuauthorBİNGÖLBALİ, BİLAL
dc.contributor.buuauthorAkpinar, Adem
dc.contributor.buuauthorAKPINAR, ADEM
dc.contributor.buuauthorJafali, Halid
dc.contributor.departmentMühendislik Fakültesi
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-0006-5843
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-4496-5974
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-5422-0119
dc.contributor.researcheridAAB-4152-2020
dc.contributor.researcheridAAC-8011-2021
dc.contributor.researcheridAAC-6763-2019
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-14T12:54:30Z
dc.date.available2024-06-14T12:54:30Z
dc.date.issued2021-05-01
dc.description.abstractAs wave energy converters (WECs) are typically designed and optimized for ocean wave conditions, they struggle to perform in low-energy seas or bays, where wave conditions are very different. This work investigates the hypothesis that downscaled versions of WECs may well be more suited for such conditions. More specifically, fifteen downscaled WECs are considered for deployment in the Black Sea. The resizing (downscaling) of the WECs is based on Froude scaling law. Ten values are considered for the scaling factor (lambda(L) = 1/4 1.0, 0.9, 0.8 ... 0.1), and the value that yields the highest capacity factor is selected for downscaling the WEC. The downscaled WEC is then compared with the original (full-scale) WEC in terms of performance (capacity factor, full-load hours, and rated capacity). This analysis is carried out for fifteen WECs and 62 locations at different water depths (5, 25, 50, 75, and 100 m), distributed on 13 lines perpendicular to the shoreline along the south-western coast of the Black Sea. The highest capacity factor was obtained by Oyster, whereas the highest energy output was achieved by SSG and WaveDragon for the locations with 4-16 m depths. For deeper waters (25, 50, 75, and 100 m), the highest capacity factor was obtained by Oceantec. In terms of energy output, the best performers were WaveDragon (at 25 m water depth) and Pontoon (at 50, 75, and 100 m water depths). The interest of this approach, however, lies not only in that it enables a scaling factor to be determined for downscaling a WEC for a given site, but also and more generally in that it proves the initial hypothesis that downscaled WECs may provide a better alternative for low-energy seas than their full-scale counterparts.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.renene.2020.12.092
dc.identifier.endpage722
dc.identifier.issn0960-1481
dc.identifier.startpage705
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.12.092
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11452/42220
dc.identifier.volume168
dc.identifier.wos000617119200006
dc.indexed.wosWOS.SCI
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.journalRenewable Energy
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi
dc.relation.tubitak214M436
dc.relation.tubitak118R024
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectWave energy converter
dc.subjectOptimum scale
dc.subjectProduction performance
dc.subjectBlack sea
dc.subjectScience & technology
dc.subjectTechnology
dc.subjectGreen & sustainable science & technology
dc.subjectEnergy & fuels
dc.subjectScience & technology - other topics
dc.subjectEnergy & fuels
dc.titleDownscaling wave energy converters for optimum performance in low-energy seas
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.departmentMühendislik Fakültesi
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationeae8fad3-a39c-4f74-b0a3-dc174fdc76ad
relation.isAuthorOfPublication7613a1fe-c70a-4b3c-9424-e4d5cabe5d81
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryeae8fad3-a39c-4f74-b0a3-dc174fdc76ad

Files

Collections