Publication:
Scapula length measurement for assessment of fetal growth and development

Placeholder

Date

Organizational Units

Authors

Gökşin, Eflatun

Authors

Dilmen, Gülçin
Turhan, Nilgün Öztürk
Toppare, Mete Fuat
Seçkin, Neslihan
Öztürk, Muazzez

Advisor

Language

Publisher:

Pergamon-Elsevier Science

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Abstract

To determine the value of prenatal ultrasonographic scapula measurements for fetal growth and development as an adjunct to assessing in utero development, a prospective study of ultrasonography was conducted in 343 pregnant women with uneventful pregnancies with gestational ages from 16 to 41 weeks, and several biometric measurements were obtained. The relationships of scapula length with gestational age and with biparietal diameter, femur length, abdominal circumference and scapul length were examined. With the ultrasonographic examinations of 343 healthy pregnant women, a nomogram of scapula length measurements estimating gestational age and predicting the biparietal diameter, abdominal circumference, and femur length was generated. Linear relationships were found between the scapula length and the gestational age (R(2) = 0.94, p < 0.0001), the biparietal diameter (R(2) = 0.94, p < 0.0001), abdominal circumference (R(2) = 0.94, P < 0.0001), and the femur length (R(2) = 0.95, p < 0.0001). The rate of increase of scapula length was significantly higher before 28 weeks of gestation than in later pregnancy (p < 0.0001). The correlation coefficients between gestational age and scapula length were 0.95 before 28 weeks of gestation and 0.86 in later weeks. These results suggest that scapula length measurement is a valuable parameter for the assessment of fetal growth and development.

Description

Source:

Keywords:

Keywords

Fetal development, Scapula, Ultrasonography, Ultrasound, Acoustics, Radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging

Citation

Dilmen, G. vd. (1995). ''Scapula length measurement for assessment of fetal growth and development''. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, 21(2), 139-142.

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

0

Views

0

Downloads