Publication:
Which kinesio tape application affects static balance: Combination of correction and facilitation techniques vs facilitation technique in healthy subjects? a randomized controlled trial

dc.contributor.authorKayıhan, Gürhan
dc.contributor.authorSayaca, Nurhan Aliye
dc.contributor.authorÖzkan, Ali
dc.contributor.buuauthorSayaca, Cetin
dc.contributor.buuauthorSAYACA, ÇETİN
dc.contributor.departmentSağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi
dc.contributor.departmentFizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon
dc.contributor.researcheridJDD-0856-2023
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-16T05:30:48Z
dc.date.available2025-01-16T05:30:48Z
dc.date.issued2024-01-01
dc.description.abstractPurpose: This study aimed to explore whether the correction on the retinaculum of the ankle with facilitation on the peroneal muscle or the facilitation technique on the peroneal muscle had an immediate effect on static balance in healthy subjects. Material and Methods: Sixty healthy individuals were investigated. Individuals were randomly separated into 3 groups. KT was applied using the facilitation technique on the peroneal muscle, or the facilitation technique on the peroneal muscle, and the correction technique on the retinaculum of the ankle. No KT was applied to the control group. The standing stork test was used to evaluate static balance with opened and closed eyes. Results: There was no difference in static balance between the groups with opened and closed eyes before and after KT application (p>0.05). There was no difference in static balance before and after KT application with opened and closed eyes in the KT -2 group (p>0.05). However, there was a significant difference in static balance before and after KT application in the KT -1 group with closed eyes (p<0.05). Conclusion: Applying the facilitation technique on peroneal muscles improved static balance when eyes were closed. No effect was observed when the correction and facilitation techniques were used together on the ankle. Many KT techniques on the ankle are not required to improve static balance; they can even affect static balance negatively.
dc.identifier.doi10.30621/jbachs.1286007
dc.identifier.endpage219
dc.identifier.issn2458-8938
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.startpage212
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.30621/jbachs.1286007
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11452/49464
dc.identifier.volume8
dc.identifier.wos 001207048500025
dc.indexed.wosWOS.ESCI
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherDokuz Eylul Univ Inst Health Sciences
dc.relation.journalJournal Of Basic And Clinical Health Sciences
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectSensorimotor system
dc.subjectDynamic balance
dc.subjectStability
dc.subjectStrength
dc.subjectDancers
dc.subjectAnkle
dc.subjectBalance
dc.subjectKinesiotape (r)
dc.subjectStatic balance
dc.subjectStanding stork test
dc.subjectScience & technology
dc.subjectLife sciences & biomedicine
dc.subjectHealth care sciences & services
dc.titleWhich kinesio tape application affects static balance: Combination of correction and facilitation techniques vs facilitation technique in healthy subjects? a randomized controlled trial
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.departmentSağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi/Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon
local.indexed.atWOS
relation.isAuthorOfPublication46800325-ee52-42da-ad51-e04cf45a3c24
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery46800325-ee52-42da-ad51-e04cf45a3c24

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Sayaca_vd_2024.pdf
Size:
1.86 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format