Yayın:
Radial optic neurotomy in central retinal vein occlusion: Preliminary results

dc.contributor.authorKaderli, Berkant
dc.contributor.authorAvcı, Remzi
dc.contributor.authorGelişken, Öner
dc.contributor.buuauthorKaderli, Berkant
dc.contributor.buuauthorAvcı, Remzi
dc.contributor.buuauthorGelişken, Öner
dc.contributor.departmentTıp Fakültesi
dc.contributor.departmentGöz Hastalıkları Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.contributor.scopusid6507602756
dc.contributor.scopusid7004838001
dc.contributor.scopusid6602526353
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-13T14:21:05Z
dc.date.issued2004-07-01
dc.description.abstractBackground: To investigate the efficacy of radial optic neurotomy (RON) on visual prognosis and clinical findings in central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). Methods: Prospective, non-randomised, self-controlled comparative trial. Six patients with ischemic CRVO who had visual acuity (VA) less than or equal to 0.1 and duration of CRVO at least 1 month, and 6 patients with non-ischemic CRVO who maintained their VA less than or equal to 0.1 during the minimal follow-up of 3 months underwent pars plana vitrectomy and RON. LogMAR VA measurement and fluorescein angiography were performed before and after surgery. Automated perimetry was obtained from 4 patients at the last visit. Main outcome measures were VA and clinical changes in fundus appearance of CRVO evaluated with fundus photography and fluorescein angiography. Results: Radial optic neurotomy was successfully performed in all 12 patients without serious complications. All patients were of clinical improvement of fundus findings. In 11 (92%) patients, a visual improvement of at least 2 lines was observed. After mean follow-up of 9.3 months, mean improvement in VA was 5.1 ± 3.1 lines (range, 2-14 lines). Cystoid macular oedema and degeneration were observed in 8 (67) patients. Four patients, two of whom had preoperative ocular hypertension had raised intraocular pressure controlled with topical antiglaucoma medication. In late postoperative period, one ischemic eye developed vitreous haemorrhage necessitating vitrectomy and endolaser photocoagulation. Automated perimetry revealed segmental visual field defects in all the examined eyes. Conclusions: Radial optic neurotomy in CRVO yields clinical and visual improvement in majority of the patients. Cystoid macular oedema and degeneration are the major factors responsible for restriction of VA improvement. Further randomised and controlled studies with longer follow-up are essential to establish the appropriate timing and indications of RON in CRVO. © Springer 2005.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10792-004-6267-z
dc.identifier.endpage223
dc.identifier.issn0165-5701
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-26944488630
dc.identifier.startpage215
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11452/52878
dc.identifier.volume25
dc.indexed.scopusScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer Netherlands
dc.relation.journalInternational Ophthalmology
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectRadial optic neurotomy
dc.subjectCentral retinal vein occlusion
dc.subject.scopusRetinal Vein Occlusion and Macular Edema Insights
dc.titleRadial optic neurotomy in central retinal vein occlusion: Preliminary results
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.departmentTıp Fakültesi/Göz Hastalıkları Ana Bilim Dalı
local.indexed.atScopus

Dosyalar