Publication:
Comparison of two disk diffusion and E-test methods in determining antibiotic susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains in isolated burn infections of Ahvaz City

dc.contributor.authorAhmadizadeh, Changiz
dc.contributor.authorPashazadeh, Mehrdad
dc.contributor.buuauthorPashazadeh, Mehrdad
dc.contributor.departmentTıp Fakülteleri
dc.contributor.departmentSağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü
dc.contributor.departmentMikrobiyoloji Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.contributor.departmentİmmünoloji Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.contributor.researcheridDZE-7532-2022
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-02T12:02:57Z
dc.date.available2024-07-02T12:02:57Z
dc.date.issued2020-10-01
dc.description.abstractBackground: Pseudomonas aeruginosa with widely distributed in nature, for human beings is considered an opportunistic pathogen that causes infections of broad-spectrum, including administrative, respiratory, septicemia and bacteremia and sepsis in patients with the burning city of Ahvaz. Method and Material: A total of 95isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from burn patients from January 2015 assemble and biochemical identification test, then they are antibiotic resistance in E. test and disk diffusion method were compared. Findings: From 95 different clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from E. test with the highest sensitivity to the antibiotic ceftazidime, 70(68/73%) and ciprofloxacin 50 (63/52%) and gentamicin 48 (52 /50 %) and the antibiotic imipenem 44 (31/46%) were sensitive and disk diffusion method antibiotic ceftazidime, 67(52/70%) and the antibiotic Ciprofloxacin 51(68/53%) and safety antibiotic imipenem 49(57/51%) and gentamicin 48(52/50%) were sensitive. Conclusion: Statistically significant differences between E. test and disk diffusion antimicrobial susceptibility of there (p<0.05) and disk diffusion method can replace E. test, and also the most sensitive antibiotics, the antibiotics used The study of the isolated Pseudomonas is ceftazidime.
dc.identifier.doi10.3329/bjms.v19i4.46620
dc.identifier.eissn2076-0299
dc.identifier.endpage651
dc.identifier.issn2223-4721
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85083431150
dc.identifier.startpage646
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3329/bjms.v19i4.46620
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.banglajol.info/index.php/BJMS/article/view/46620
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11452/42747
dc.identifier.volume19
dc.identifier.wos000527244700011
dc.indexed.wosWOS.ESCI
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherIbn Sina Trust
dc.relation.journalBangladesh Journal of Medical Science
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectPseudomonas aeruginosa
dc.subjectDisk diffusion
dc.subjectE. test
dc.subjectAntibiotic sensitivity
dc.subjectGeneral & internal medicine
dc.titleComparison of two disk diffusion and E-test methods in determining antibiotic susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains in isolated burn infections of Ahvaz City
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.departmentTıp Fakülteleri/İmmünoloji Ana Bilim Dalı
local.contributor.departmentSağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü/Mikrobiyoloji Ana Bilim Dalı
local.indexed.atWOS
local.indexed.atScopus

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Ahmadizadeh_ve_Pashazadeh_2020.pdf
Size:
550.42 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format