Yayın:
Multiple Small-Scale Object Detection in Aerial Vehicle Images using Standard or Optimized YOLO Detectors

dc.contributor.authorKaymakçı, Zekeriya Eren
dc.contributor.authorAkarsu, Meftun
dc.contributor.authorÖztürk, Ceyda Nur
dc.contributor.buuauthorKaymakçı, Zekeriya Eren
dc.contributor.buuauthorAkarsu, Meftun
dc.contributor.buuauthorÖZTÜRK, CEYDA NUR
dc.contributor.departmentMühendislik Fakültesi
dc.contributor.departmentBilgisayar Mühendisliği Bölümü
dc.contributor.departmentElektronik Mühendisliği Bölümü
dc.contributor.scopusid58759639900
dc.contributor.scopusid58759459500
dc.contributor.scopusid56567596600
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-13T06:19:31Z
dc.date.issued2023-01-01
dc.description.abstractWidespread employment of low-altitude aerial vehicles that are equipped with cameras and communication devices has increased the range of mobile surveillance applications. Object tracking, anomaly detection, synopsis view construction, or statistical analysis systems using aerial vehicle images require efficient multiple small-scale object detection as an initial stage. In this study, standard YOLO object detectors were trained with the images of VisDrone-2019 using computational resources of a cloud platform, and these detectors were optimized for various hardware systems considering their embedded use in aerial vehicles. Comparisons between six different YOLO versions indicated that YOLOv8-1280 and YOLOv7-1280 were the most precise but the slowest detectors for small-scale objects in aerial images with their 0.489% and 0.396% mean average precision (mAP) values, respectively. However, the computational speeds of YOLOv8-640 and YOLOv7-640 were almost quadrupled without significant precision loss. According to the experiments that compared the standard and optimized versions of YOLOv3, YOLOv4, and YOLOv5, while the optimized detector versions that were generated using TensorRT could process about 2 times more frames per second (fps), up to 6% reduction in their mAP values was observed. Overall, YOLOv5-640 was the best model in trading off the mAP values for fps with its 5.67 and 65.56 fps values in Jetson Nano and Jetson Orin.
dc.description.sponsorshipOpenCEMS - Connected Environment and Distributed Energy Data Management Solutions
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/INISTA59065.2023.10310562
dc.identifier.isbn[9798350338904]
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85179557906
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11452/51535
dc.indexed.scopusScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
dc.relation.journal17th International Conference on INnovations in Intelligent SysTems and Applications, INISTA 2023 - Proceedings
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectYOLO detectors
dc.subjectTensorRT optimization
dc.subjectObject detection
dc.subjectEmbedded systems
dc.subjectAerial vehicle images
dc.titleMultiple Small-Scale Object Detection in Aerial Vehicle Images using Standard or Optimized YOLO Detectors
dc.typeconferenceObject
dc.type.subtypeConference Paper
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.departmentMühendislik Fakültesi/Bilgisayar Mühendisliği Bölümü
local.contributor.departmentMühendislik Fakültesi/Elektronik Mühendisliği Bölümü
local.indexed.atScopus
relation.isAuthorOfPublication864ac670-e776-4a40-995f-b6b1716f9051
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery864ac670-e776-4a40-995f-b6b1716f9051

Dosyalar