Yayın:
Basic Sampling Methods: What is the Knowledge Level of Academic Staff?

dc.contributor.authorCan, F.E.
dc.contributor.authorErcan, İ.
dc.contributor.authorSığırlı, D.
dc.contributor.authorKaya, M.O.
dc.contributor.authorUysal, Ö.
dc.contributor.buuauthorERCAN, İLKER
dc.contributor.buuauthorSIĞIRLI, DENİZ
dc.contributor.buuauthorCan, Fatma Ezgi
dc.contributor.departmentTıp Fakültesi
dc.contributor.departmentBiyoistatistik Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-1953-7735
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-2382-290X
dc.contributor.scopusid56689608500
dc.contributor.scopusid6603789069
dc.contributor.scopusid24482063400
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-13T09:31:30Z
dc.date.issued2019-04-01
dc.description.abstractObjective: Researchers are rarely able to sample the entire population of interest in health science studies, owing to a large number of subjects. In such situations, the researcher studies a sample obtained from the target population and applies the findings from the sample to infer conclusions about the related population. Obtaining valid and reliable results is completely dependent on the selection of an appropriate sampling method. The aim of this study is to inform readers about the most common sampling methods and to investigate the level of knowledge of physicians working with academic staff. Material and Methods: A total of 104 medical academic staff members participated in our study. We obtained data using a questionnaire and by conducting a face-to-face interview. Results: While 26.92% of the participants correctly answered the question on the simple random sampling, only 8.65% and 2.88% of the participants correctly answered the questions on stratified sampling and systematic samp-ling, respectively. No significant difference was noted in terms of matching correct sampling methods by academic category. Conclusion: In health science, obtaining reliable results can be achieved by using statistical methods during the planning stage as part of the concluding stages of the study. Biostatistics experts should be consulted at every stage of the study.
dc.identifier.doi10.5152/ejra.2019.135
dc.identifier.endpage 5
dc.identifier.issn2636-8072
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85166338410
dc.identifier.startpage1
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11452/52124
dc.identifier.volume2
dc.indexed.scopusScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAVES
dc.relation.journalEuropean Journal of Rhinology and Allergy
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectSystematic sampling
dc.subjectStratified sampling
dc.subjectSimple random sampling
dc.subjectSampling methods
dc.subjectMedical education
dc.subject.scopusIntegration of Biostatistics in Medical Research
dc.titleBasic Sampling Methods: What is the Knowledge Level of Academic Staff?
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.indexed.atScopus
relation.isAuthorOfPublication50e4dfdb-25cd-43af-94c9-464881669605
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationf8b7b771-12ea-4f9a-889d-25079d8c862d
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery50e4dfdb-25cd-43af-94c9-464881669605

Dosyalar