Yayın:
Effect of different drying methods on bioactive potential and nutrients of medlar fruit

dc.contributor.authorArkain, Begüm
dc.contributor.authorAlibaş, İlknur
dc.contributor.buuauthorArkain, Begüm
dc.contributor.buuauthorALİBAŞ, İLKNUR
dc.contributor.departmentZiraat Fakültesi
dc.contributor.departmentBiyosistem Mühendisliği
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-1898-8390
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-6044-4517
dc.contributor.researcheridW-7087-2018
dc.contributor.researcheridKPQ-4336-2024
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-17T11:22:37Z
dc.date.issued2025-03-25
dc.description.abstractIn the study, medlar samples were dried using natural drying in the shade at 25 degrees C, convective drying at 40, 50, and 60 degrees C, microwave drying at 200, 400, and 600 W, and combined drying with a combination of convective drying temperatures and microwave output powers. In order to precisely determine the effect of the method used, each drying technique was considered in a comprehensive framework. The moisture content of medlar was reduced from 74.07 to 11.75%. While the drying process took the longest time in shade drying, the drying process took the shortest time at 600 W-60 degrees C. The closest results to fresh product in terms of total protein content were found at 400 W. In addition, phosphorus, potassium, sodium and copper contents were maximised at 600 W-60 degrees C. The maximum contents for magnesium and manganese were 400 W-40 degrees C, while for zinc, it was 600 W-40 degrees C. After fresh products, the highest calcium was obtained at 600 W, and the highest iron was obtained at 200 W. The bioactive potential of medlar samples was evaluated in terms of extractable, hydrolysable and bioaccessible phenolic fractions by total phenolic content and antioxidant capacity assays. In terms of TPC, the bioaccessibility of the samples was highest when natural drying was used. The highest bioaccessibility values for ABTS, DPPH and CUPRAC were obtained at natural drying, 200 W-50 degrees C and 400 W-60 degrees C, respectively. As a result, DPPH was the most suitable antioxidant capacity determination method due to high results.
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41598-025-86955-3
dc.identifier.issn2045-2322
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105000626367
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-86955-3
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11452/55652
dc.identifier.volume15
dc.identifier.wos001452469400030
dc.indexed.wosWOS.SCI
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherNature portfolio
dc.relation.journalScientific reports
dc.subjectIn-vitro bioaccessibilhyti
dc.subjectAntioxidant activthy
dc.subjectHot air
dc.subjectMicrowave
dc.subjectColor
dc.subjectCapacity
dc.subjectParameters
dc.subjectKinetics
dc.subjectPhenolics
dc.subjectQuality
dc.subjectMedlar
dc.subjectProtein
dc.subjectNutrients
dc.subjectTotal phenolic
dc.subjectAntioxidant capacity
dc.subjectScience & technology
dc.subjectMultidisciplinary sciences
dc.subjectScience & technology - other topics
dc.titleEffect of different drying methods on bioactive potential and nutrients of medlar fruit
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.departmentZiraat Fakültesi/Biyosistem Mühendisliği
local.indexed.atWOS
local.indexed.atScopus
relation.isAuthorOfPublication5a33a7f0-0523-4b0b-aa19-87ef2eb86277
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery5a33a7f0-0523-4b0b-aa19-87ef2eb86277

Dosyalar

Orijinal seri

Şimdi gösteriliyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
Ad:
Arkain_Alibaş_2025.pdf
Boyut:
1.63 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format