Yayın:
Comparison of various adsorbents for long-term diffusive sampling of volatile organic compounds

dc.contributor.authorBallantine, James A.
dc.contributor.buuauthorKılıç, Naciye
dc.contributor.departmentFen Edebiyat Fakültesi
dc.contributor.departmentKimya Bölümü
dc.contributor.scopusid56240238700
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-23T06:08:40Z
dc.date.available2021-08-23T06:08:40Z
dc.date.issued1998
dc.description.abstractThe relative performances of diffusive samplers packed with Tenax TA, Chromosorb 106 and Carbotrap for the long-term diffusive sampling of several typical volatile organic compounds were compared. In order to measure the magnitudes of the decreases in mass uptakes in a real long-term diffusive sampling situation, the results for 7 and 14 d sampling periods were compared with the sum of consecutive 1 d diffusive sampling results, performed in parallel for the same period of time. The results of this study gives information about the magnitudes of the decreases in mass uptakes in a real sampling situation and show the limitations of the adsorbents tested for the sampling of volatile organic compounds from different classes such as acetone and dichloromethane as compounds with a functional group, toluene as an example of aromatic compounds and pentane, hexane, nonane decane and undecane as examples of straight chain hydrocarbons (C-5-C-11) It was shown that the data obtained from long-term diffusive sampling are subject to significant error, particularly for low boiling compounds. Chromosorb 106 could be the adsorbent of choice fbr this sampling situation, as it gives the highest percentage of masses (ng) collected for longer exposure periods relative to the sum of the masses (ng) collected over each exposure period among the other adsorbents tested.
dc.identifier.citationKılıç, N. ve Ballantine, J. A. (1998). "Comparison of various adsorbents for long-term diffusive sampling of volatile organic compounds". Analyst, 123(9), 1795-1797.
dc.identifier.doi10.1039/a801339j
dc.identifier.endpage1797
dc.identifier.issn0003-2654
dc.identifier.issue9
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-0031693409
dc.identifier.startpage1795
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1039/a801339j
dc.identifier.urihttps://pubs.rsc.org/En/content/articlelanding/1998/an/a801339j
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11452/21508
dc.identifier.volume123
dc.identifier.wos000075929300004
dc.indexed.wosSCIE
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherRoyal Soc Chemistry
dc.relation.collaborationYurt dışı
dc.relation.journalAnalyst
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectChemistry
dc.subject.emtreeAliphatic hydrocarbon
dc.subject.emtreeAromatic compound
dc.subject.emtreeDecane
dc.subject.emtreeDichloromethane
dc.subject.emtreeHexane
dc.subject.emtreePentane
dc.subject.emtreeVolatile organic compound
dc.subject.emtreeAbsorption
dc.subject.emtreeCalibration
dc.subject.emtreeControlled study
dc.subject.emtreeGas diffusion
dc.subject.emtreeSampling
dc.subject.scopusSamplers; Volatile Organic Compounds; Nitrogen Dioxide
dc.subject.wosChemistry, analytical
dc.titleComparison of various adsorbents for long-term diffusive sampling of volatile organic compounds
dc.typeArticle
dc.wos.quartileQ1
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.departmentFen Edebiyat Fakültesi/Kimya Bölümü
local.indexed.atScopus
local.indexed.atWOS

Dosyalar

Lisanslı seri

Şimdi gösteriliyor 1 - 1 / 1
Placeholder
Ad:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama