Publication:
Honeybee (Apis mellifera ligustica) use of color and pattern in making foraging choices

dc.contributor.authorWells, Harrington
dc.contributor.authorCoburn, Philip
dc.contributor.authorAthens, Michael
dc.contributor.authorHill, Peggy S. M.
dc.contributor.buuauthorÇakmak, İbrahim
dc.contributor.departmentZiraat Fakültesi
dc.contributor.researcheridAAH-2558-2021
dc.contributor.scopusid57207796431
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-08T06:11:47Z
dc.date.available2021-12-08T06:11:47Z
dc.date.issued2000-10
dc.description.abstractHoneybees can use various kinds of information, including color and pattern, in choosing flowers during foraging. We offered free-flying bees a dimorphic artificial patch of radial and bilateral blue/white flowers in order to examine three hypotheses to explain the noted increase in visitation to the flower type offering a lower caloric reward, i.e., optical resolution, dyslectic interpretation, and cognition related to pattern colors. When bees were offered a color pattern rather than a simple color difference to differentiate flower types, they did not always make choices predicted by theory. Honeybees foraged randomly on both flower morphs when rewards were equal and chose the higher caloric reward more often when rewards were different. However, they visited the less rewarding choice more than 33% of the time. Increasing the size of the flower surface by doubling the dimensions did not decrease visitation to the less rewarding flower type, suggesting that visual acuity is not the limiting factor in flower sizes used. When flower colors that increased contrast (yellow vs, blue) were used in the dimorphic parch, visitation rate to the less rewarding flower type did not decline, nor did this 'error rate' decrease when identical patterns were used with only partial color differences. Adding an orientation reference on each flower decreased the frequency with which the less rewarding flower type was chosen from 36 to 26%, possibly because foragers were induced to switch from a global cue (e.g., patch) to a local cue (e.g.. flower). The rate with which the less rewarding flower type is chosen appears to be a function of honeybee use of cognitive and sensory modalities, rather than limited memory and correlative abilities.
dc.identifier.citationWells, H. vd. (2000). "Honeybee (Apis mellifera ligustica) use of color and pattern in making foraging choices". Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society, 73(4), 195-207.
dc.identifier.endpage207
dc.identifier.issn0022-8567
dc.identifier.issn1937-2353
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-0034923411
dc.identifier.startpage195
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.jstor.org/stable/25085970
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11452/23058
dc.identifier.volume73
dc.identifier.wos000169799100002
dc.indexed.wosSCIE
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherKansas Entomological Society
dc.relation.collaborationYurt dışı
dc.relation.journalJournal of the Kansas Entomological Society
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectEntomology
dc.subjectFlower constancy
dc.subjectBees
dc.subjectVision
dc.subjectDiscrimination
dc.subjectRecognition
dc.subjectParameters
dc.subjectStimuli
dc.subjectRegions
dc.subjectSize
dc.subjectRisk
dc.subjectBee
dc.subjectColor
dc.subjectFlower visiting
dc.subjectForaging behavior
dc.subjectVisual cue
dc.subject.scopusBombus; Pollinators; Foragers
dc.subject.wosEntomology
dc.titleHoneybee (Apis mellifera ligustica) use of color and pattern in making foraging choices
dc.typeArticle
dc.wos.quartileQ4
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.departmentZiraat Fakültesi
local.indexed.atScopus
local.indexed.atWOS

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Placeholder
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: