Publication: Randomized comparison of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate vs emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in patients with lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis b
dc.contributor.author | Fung, Scott | |
dc.contributor.author | Kwan, Peter | |
dc.contributor.author | Fabri, Milotka | |
dc.contributor.author | Horban, Andrzej | |
dc.contributor.author | Pelemis, Mijomir | |
dc.contributor.author | Hann, Hie-Won | |
dc.contributor.author | Gürel, Selim | |
dc.contributor.author | Caruntu, Florin A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Flaherty, John F. | |
dc.contributor.author | Massetto, Benedetta | |
dc.contributor.author | Dinh, Phillip | |
dc.contributor.author | Corsa, Amoreena | |
dc.contributor.author | Subramanian, G. Mani | |
dc.contributor.author | McHutchison, John G. | |
dc.contributor.author | Husa, Petr | |
dc.contributor.author | Gane, Edward | |
dc.contributor.buuauthor | GÜREL, SELİM | |
dc.contributor.department | Uludag Üniversitesi | |
dc.contributor.department | Tıp Fakültesi | |
dc.contributor.researcherid | HLH-8209-2023 | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-08-15T11:00:14Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-08-15T11:00:14Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014-04-01 | |
dc.description.abstract | BACKGROUND & AIMS: Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) is active against lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, but data to support its clinical efficacy in this setting are limited.METHODS: In a prospective, double-blind, 96-week trial, patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to groups given TDF (300 mg, n = 141) or a combination of emtricitabine (FTC, 200 mg; n 139) and TDF (300 mg, FTC/TDF). Patients were hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) - positive or HBeAg-negative, with levels of HBV DNA >= 3 log10 IU/mL and lamivudine resistance mutations (HBV polymerase or reverse transcriptase amino acid substitutions rtM204I/V +/- rtL180M by INNO-LiPA Multi-DR v3; Innogenetics, Inc, Alpharetta, GA). The primary end point was proportion with HBV DNA <69 IU/mL (Roche COBAS Taqman assay; Roche Molecular Systems, Inc, Pleasanton, CA).RESULTS: Patient groups were well matched for demographic and disease characteristics, including region (60% from Europe), HBV genotype (45% genotype D), HBeAg status (47% HBeAg-positive), and duration of lamivudine treatment (mean, 3.8 years). At week 96 of treatment, 89.4% of patients in the TDF group and 86.3% in the FTC/TDF group had levels of HBV DNA <69 IU/mL (P = .43). HBeAg loss and seroconversion did not differ between groups; only 1 patient (0.7%) in the FTC/TDF group lost hepatitis B surface antigen. Treatment was well tolerated; confirmed renal events (creatinine increase of >= 0.5 mg/dL [>44 umol/L], creatinine clearance <50 mL/min, or level of PO4 <2 mg/dL [<0.65 mmol/L]) were generally mild and infrequent (<1%). Small reductions (<2%) in mean bone mineral density of hip and spine were detected by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in both groups. No TDF resistance developed through 96 weeks of treatment.CONCLUSIONS: TDF alone is safe and effective for treatment of patients with lamivudine-resistant, chronic HBV infection. Clinical Trials.gov No, NCT00737568. | |
dc.description.sponsorship | Gilead Sciences | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.12.028 | |
dc.identifier.endpage | U521 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0016-5085 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 4 | |
dc.identifier.startpage | 980 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2013.12.028 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0016508513018428 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11452/44065 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 146 | |
dc.identifier.wos | 000333254500027 | |
dc.indexed.wos | WOS.SCI | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | W B Saunders Co-Elsevier Inc | |
dc.relation.journal | Gastroenterology | |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | |
dc.subject | Bone-mineral density | |
dc.subject | Genotypic resistance | |
dc.subject | Combination therapy | |
dc.subject | Nucleotide analogs | |
dc.subject | Adefovir dipivoxil | |
dc.subject | Turnover markers | |
dc.subject | Naive patients | |
dc.subject | Entecavir | |
dc.subject | Virus | |
dc.subject | Management | |
dc.subject | Hbv dna | |
dc.subject | Hepatitis b e antigen | |
dc.subject | Renal function | |
dc.subject | Viral suppression | |
dc.subject | Gastroenterology & hepatology | |
dc.title | Randomized comparison of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate vs emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in patients with lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis b | |
dc.type | Article | |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
local.contributor.department | Uludag Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi | |
relation.isAuthorOfPublication | d7a9ea11-69fc-4122-a365-8fb2123512e6 | |
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | d7a9ea11-69fc-4122-a365-8fb2123512e6 |