Publication:
Comparative performance analysis of ORC-VCRC combined systems based on refrigerant selection

dc.contributor.authorÖzdemir Küçük, Esra
dc.contributor.authorKılıç, Muhsin
dc.contributor.buuauthorÖZDEMİR KÜÇÜK, ESRA
dc.contributor.buuauthorKILIÇ, MUHSİN
dc.contributor.departmentBursa Uludağ Üniversitesi/Yenişehir İbrahim Orhan Meslek Yüksekokulu/Makine Bölümü.
dc.contributor.departmentBursa Uludağ Üniversitesi/Mühendislik Fakültesi/Makine Mühendisliği Bölümü.
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-8146-0495
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-2113-4510
dc.contributor.researcheridAAG-6562-2021
dc.contributor.researcheridO-2253-2015
dc.contributor.researcheridIQW-0498-2023
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-02T11:06:38Z
dc.date.available2024-07-02T11:06:38Z
dc.date.issued2021-01-01
dc.description.abstractIn this study, the combined power and refrigeration cycles driven by low-grade thermal energy are evaluated. An organic Rankine cycle (ORC) and a vapor compression refrigeration cycle (VCRC) are linked for both power generation and cooling. Three different combined cycle configurations are considered in the analyses. These are a basic ORC-VCRC, a dual-fluid basic ORC-VCRC, and a dual-fluid ORC-VCRC with an internal heat exchanger (IHE) and liquid-vapor heat exchanger (LVHE). The effects of the combined cycle configuration design on overall coefficients of performance (COPs) and the exergy efficiency of the system are examined. The highest overall COPs and exergy efficiency values at the operating conditions are obtained for the dual-fluid ORC-VCRC with IHE-LVHE as 0.72 and 19.5%, respectively. A comprehensive energy and exergy analysis is also performed for the dual-fluid ORC-VCRC with IHE-LVHE. The selection of the optimum fluid pair for ORC-VCRC is also investigated in the study. Thirty different fluid pair combinations are evaluated and compared using R123, R245fa, R600, R114, R141b, R290, R134a, and R143a refrigerants. The parametric analysis of the integrated system is performed depending on various operating conditions. Results show that the best performance among the cases considered is observed when the refrigerant R123 is used in the ORC-VCRC combined system.
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/23744731.2020.1778400
dc.identifier.eissn2374-474X
dc.identifier.endpage84
dc.identifier.issn2374-4731
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.startpage70
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/23744731.2020.1778400
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23744731.2020.1778400
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11452/42739
dc.identifier.volume27
dc.identifier.wos000549077000001
dc.indexed.wosWOS.SCI
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis
dc.relation.journalScience and Technology for the Built Environment
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectOrganic rankine-cycle
dc.subjectVapor compression cycle
dc.subjectFluid selection
dc.subjectWorking fluids
dc.subjectParametric optimization
dc.subjectExergy analysis
dc.subjectThermodynamic analysis
dc.subjectPower
dc.subjectEnergy
dc.subjectTemperature
dc.subjectThermodynamics
dc.subjectConstruction & building technology
dc.subjectEngineering
dc.titleComparative performance analysis of ORC-VCRC combined systems based on refrigerant selection
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationedd02203-2d40-48f1-869b-e0f9adf6517a
relation.isAuthorOfPublication56d98e3d-139a-4bf2-b105-8e1402865346
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryedd02203-2d40-48f1-869b-e0f9adf6517a

Files

Collections