Yayın:
Speckle-tracking echocardiography in dogs: Evaluating imaging parameters and methodological variability in global longitudinal strain assessment

dc.contributor.authorMogensen, Jonas E.
dc.contributor.authorBach, Maiken B. T.
dc.contributor.authorBay, Pernille G.
dc.contributor.authorVarlik, Tugba
dc.contributor.authorWillesen, Jakob L.
dc.contributor.authorGleerup, Caroline H.
dc.contributor.authorKoch, Jorgen
dc.contributor.buuauthorVarlık, Tuğba
dc.contributor.departmentVeteriner Fakültesi
dc.contributor.departmentİç Hastalıkları Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.contributor.researcheridLZZ-2781-2025
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-21T09:30:48Z
dc.date.issued2025-05-23
dc.description.abstractTwo-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography (2D-STE) is an advanced imaging technique that offers quantitative insights into myocardial function by analyzing the motion of speckles created during ultrasound-tissue interactions. This study aims to evaluate the reliability of 2D-STE by examining the impact of key technical parameters on global longitudinal strain (GLS) measurement accuracy and comparing two speckle-tracking analysis methods provided by GE Healthcare: quantitative analysis of the 2D strain (2D strain) and automated function imaging (AFI). The prospective study consisted of two cohorts. In the first cohort, including 16 healthy dogs, the influence of frame rate, heart rate variation, zoom, transducer frequency, and image foreshortening on speckle-tracking values was assessed. In the second cohort, which included 10 healthy dogs, 2D-STE parameters were obtained with the 2D strain and AFI to assess agreement between the methods and observer variability. Our findings indicate that foreshortening (p < 0.01, Cohen's d: 0.52, CI: -17.81 to -24.83) and heart rate variability (p = 0.02, Cohen's d: 0.72, CI: -18.07 to -26.23) significantly affect speckle-tracking measurements. While zoom, frame rate, and frequency did not show a significant impact. Additionally, while the 2D strain and AFI exhibited a strong correlation, a significant systematic bias was identified, with AFI underestimating strain values compared to the 2D strain. Intra- and inter-observer coefficients of variation (CV) were below 9% for both methods, supporting their reliability. These findings emphasize the need to optimize image acquisition and selection criteria, which enhances the accuracy and reliability of the speckle-tracking analysis.
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/ani15111523
dc.identifier.issn2076-2615
dc.identifier.issue11
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105007908394
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/ani15111523
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11452/56060
dc.identifier.volume15
dc.identifier.wos001506496700001
dc.indexed.wosWOS.SCI
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.relation.journalAnimals
dc.subjectDeformation
dc.subjectStandard
dc.subjectCanine
dc.subjectSpeckle-tracking echocardiography
dc.subjectMyocardial function
dc.subject2D-STE
dc.subjectGlobal longitudinal strain
dc.subjectDog
dc.subjectHeart
dc.subjectAgriculture
dc.subjectZoology
dc.subjectVeterinary sciences
dc.subjectScience & Technology
dc.subjectLife Sciences & Biomedicine
dc.subjectAgriculture, Dairy & Animal Science
dc.titleSpeckle-tracking echocardiography in dogs: Evaluating imaging parameters and methodological variability in global longitudinal strain assessment
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.departmentVeteriner Fakültesi/İç Hastalıkları Ana Bilim Dalı
local.indexed.atWOS
local.indexed.atScopus

Dosyalar

Orijinal seri

Şimdi gösteriliyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
Ad:
Varlik_2025.pdf
Boyut:
2.71 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format