Yayın:
Thematic analysis of articles focusing on mathematical literacy in mathematics teaching-learning process

dc.contributor.authorÜlger, Tuğçe Kozaklı
dc.contributor.authorBozkurt, Işıl
dc.contributor.authorAltun, Murat
dc.contributor.buuauthorÜlger, Tuğçe Kozaklı
dc.contributor.buuauthorBozkurt, Işıl
dc.contributor.buuauthorAltun, Murat
dc.contributor.departmentEğitim Fakültesi
dc.contributor.researcheridA-6621-2018
dc.contributor.researcheridABF-7587-2020
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-09T07:57:52Z
dc.date.available2024-07-09T07:57:52Z
dc.date.issued2020-01-01
dc.descriptionBu çalışma, 11-13 Mayıs 2017 tarihleri arasında Şanlıurfa [Türkiye]'de düzenlenen International Conference on Mathematics and Mathematics Education (ICMME)’da bildiri olarak sunulmuştur.
dc.description.abstractThe issue of how to increase the achievement level of mathematics literacy has become the focus of studies on mathematics education. Even though there have currently been many studies, no detailed study has been found related to their methods, content, and which component of mathematics literacy. The aim of this study is to carry out thematic analysis of the articles focusing on mathematics literacy in the education process and reveal the extent to which the researched subjects meet the needs in terms of quality and quantity, and what kind of research is needed. However, the fact that there are many studies (181) on mathematics literacy has led to the need to classify the articles before the thematic analysis. Based on the Principles of School Mathematics (equality, curriculum, teaching, learning, evaluation, and technology), 74 articles were selected for analysis after a preliminary classification of the articles followed by at least one of the principles. In this study, the general characteristics (types of journals and year of publication), rationale, purpose, research methods, sample, results and suggestions of the examined articles were analyzed and presented. Two main categories were identified in the studies examined in this study: (i) Describing a situation by summarizing the information and making it more distinguishable, (ii) Identifying the problem and proposing a model for the solution of this problem, and increasing the ML achievement level by testing and evaluating this model. Most of the studies examined were classified in the first category. It was observed that the studies in the second category were insufficient in number. In particular, the results of studies reporting difficulties in solving the ML problems can be a starting point for improving the teaching and repetition of such studies is considered as a need.
dc.identifier.doi10.15390/EB.2020.8028
dc.identifier.endpage37
dc.identifier.issn1300-1337
dc.identifier.issue201
dc.identifier.startpage1
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2020.8028
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11452/43073
dc.identifier.volume45
dc.identifier.wos000510827300001
dc.indexed.wosWOS.SSCI
dc.indexed.wosWOS.ISSHP
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTurkish Education Assoc
dc.relation.journalEgitim Ve Bilim-education And Science
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectQualitative research
dc.subjectSelf-efficacy
dc.subjectKnowledge
dc.subjectStudents
dc.subjectClassification
dc.subjectPerceptions
dc.subjectTextbook
dc.subjectProgram
dc.subjectScience
dc.subjectContext
dc.subjectMathematical literacy
dc.subjectMathematics learning-teaching process
dc.subjectThematic analysis
dc.subjectSocial sciences
dc.subjectEducation & educational research
dc.titleThematic analysis of articles focusing on mathematical literacy in mathematics teaching-learning process
dc.typeconferenceObject
dc.type.subtypeProceedings Paper
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.departmentEğitim Fakültesi
local.indexed.atWOS

Dosyalar