Publication:
A comparative study of energy consumption and recovery of autonomous fuel-cell hydrogen-electric vehicles using different powertrains based on regenerative braking and electronic stability control system

dc.contributor.buuauthorYıldız, Ahmet
dc.contributor.buuauthorÖzel, Mert Ali
dc.contributor.departmentUludağ Üniversitesi/Mühendislik Fakültesi/Makina Mühendisliği.
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-5434-4368
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-2887-3359
dc.contributor.researcheridT-8076-2018
dc.contributor.researcheridAAP-3077-2021
dc.contributor.scopusid58070251000
dc.contributor.scopusid57222521121
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-24T10:11:02Z
dc.date.available2024-05-24T10:11:02Z
dc.date.issued2021-03
dc.description.abstractToday, with the increasing transition to electric vehicles (EVs), the design of highly energy-efficient vehicle architectures has taken precedence for many car manufacturers. To this end, the energy consumption and recovery rates of different powertrain vehicle architectures need to be investigated comprehensively. In this study, six different powertrain architectures-four independent in-wheel motors with regenerative electronic stability control (RESC) and without an RESC, one-stage gear (1G) transmission, two-stage gear (2G) transmission, continuously variable transmission (CVT) and downsized electric motor with CVT-were mathematically modeled and analyzed under real road conditions using nonlinear models of an autonomous hydrogen fuel-cell electric vehicle (HFCEV). The aims of this paper were twofold: first, to compare the energy consumption performance of powertrain architectures by analyzing the effects of the regenerative electronic stability control (RESC) system, and secondly, to investigate the usability of a downsized electrical motor for an HFCEV. For this purpose, all the numerical simulations were conducted for the well-known FTP75 and NEDC urban drive cycles. The obtained results demonstrate that the minimum energy consumption can be achieved by a 2G-based powertrain using the same motor; however, when an RESC system is used, the energy recovery/consumption rate can be increased. Moreover, the results of the article show that it is possible to use a downsized electric motor due to the CVT, and this powertrain significantly reduces the energy consumption of the HFCEV as compared to all the other systems. The results of this paper present highly significant implications for automotive manufacturers for designing and developing a cleaner electrical vehicle energy consumption and recovery system.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/app11062515
dc.identifier.issn2076-3417
dc.identifier.issue6
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85103060378
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/6/2515
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11452/41522
dc.identifier.volume11
dc.identifier.wos000645784000001
dc.indexed.scopusScopus
dc.indexed.wosSCIE
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMPDI
dc.relation.journalApplied Sciences
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectEnergy consumption and recovery
dc.subjectTransmission layouts
dc.subjectFuel-cell electric vehicles
dc.subjectControl strategy
dc.subjectLife-cycle
dc.subjectDesign
dc.subjectCVT
dc.subjectOptimization
dc.subjectImpacts
dc.subject.scopusRegenerative Braking; Electric Vehicle; Energy Engineering
dc.subject.wosChemistry, multidisciplinary
dc.subject.wosEngineering, multidisciplinary
dc.subject.wosMaterials Science, multidisciplinary
dc.subject.wosPhysics, applied
dc.titleA comparative study of energy consumption and recovery of autonomous fuel-cell hydrogen-electric vehicles using different powertrains based on regenerative braking and electronic stability control system
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Yıldız_Özel_2021.pdf
Size:
8.2 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format