Yayın:
Theme 7. Sharing international experiences in disasters: Summary and action plan

dc.contributor.authorBraham, M.
dc.contributor.authorAghababian, R.
dc.contributor.authorAndrews, R.A.
dc.contributor.authorAustin, C.
dc.contributor.authorBrown, R.
dc.contributor.authorChen, Y.Z.
dc.contributor.authorEngindeniz, Z.
dc.contributor.authorGirouard, R.
dc.contributor.authorLeaman, P.
dc.contributor.authorMasellis, M.
dc.contributor.authorNakayama, S.
dc.contributor.authorPolentsov, Y.O.
dc.contributor.authorSuserud, B.O.
dc.contributor.buuauthorEngindeniz, Zülfi
dc.contributor.departmentTıp Fakültesi
dc.contributor.departmentGenel Cerrahi Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-1874-5097
dc.contributor.scopusid6507354145
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-13T14:27:50Z
dc.date.issued2001-01-01
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The discussions in this theme provided an opportunity to share specific experiences with disasters that occurred outside of the Asia-Pacific Rim.Methods: Details of the methods used are provided in the preceding paper. The chairs moderated all presentations and produced a summary that was presented to an assembly of all of the delegates. Since the findings from the Theme 7 and Theme 3 groups were similar, the chairs of both groups presided over one workshop that resulted in the generation of a set of action plans that then were reported to the collective group of all delegates.Results: The main points developed during the presentations and discussion included: (1) disaster response planning, (2) predetermined command and organizational structure, (3) rapid response capability, (4) mitigation, and (5) communications and alternatives.Discussion: The action plans presented are in common with those presented by Theme 3, and include: (1) plan disaster responses including the different types, identification of hazards, training based on experiences, and provision of public education; (2) improving coordination and control; (3) maintaining communications assuming infrastructure breakdown; (4) maximizing mitigation through standardized evaluations, creation of a legal framework, and recognition of advocacy and public participation; and (5) providing resources and knowledge through access to existing therapies, using the media, and increasing decentralization of hospital inventories.Conclusions: Most of the problems that occurred outside the Asia-Pacific rim relative to disaster management are similar to those experienced within it. They should be addressed in common with the rest of the world. Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2001.
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S1049023X00025565
dc.identifier.endpage45
dc.identifier.issn1049-023X
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84871086697
dc.identifier.startpage42
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11452/52950
dc.identifier.volume16
dc.indexed.scopusScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherCambridge University Press
dc.relation.journalPrehospital and Disaster Medicine
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectSecurity
dc.subjectResponses
dc.subjectPrevention
dc.subjectPlanning
dc.subjectMitigation
dc.subjectMilitary
dc.subjectExperiences
dc.subjectDisaster
dc.subjectCommunications
dc.subjectCommand structure
dc.subjectAsia-Pacific
dc.subject.scopusDisaster Medical Response and Injury Management
dc.titleTheme 7. Sharing international experiences in disasters: Summary and action plan
dc.typeconferenceObject
dc.type.subtypeConference Paper
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.departmentTıp Fakültesi/ Genel Cerrahi Ana Bilim Dalı
local.indexed.atScopus

Dosyalar