Yayın:
Impact of different ranges of motion in the prone barbell row on muscle excitation

dc.contributor.authorFischer, Josef
dc.contributor.authorBurger, Christian
dc.contributor.authorSeguel, Josefina Manieu
dc.contributor.authorPaternoster, Florian Kurt
dc.contributor.authorTilp, Markus
dc.contributor.authorKonrad, Andreas
dc.contributor.buuauthorRodoplu, Coşkun
dc.contributor.departmentSpor Bilimleri Fakültesi
dc.contributor.departmentBeden Eğitimi ve Spor Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.contributor.researcheridGVS-7593-2022
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-06T16:52:15Z
dc.date.issued2025-08-01
dc.description.abstractThis study investigated muscle excitation via surface electromyography (sEMG) during different ranges of motion (ROMs) in the prone barbell row. Sixteen resistance-trained males performed a 10-repetition maximum (10RM) across three ROMs: full, upper half, and lower half. Time under tension was standardized at 2 s for both the concentric and eccentric phases. SEMG measurements were taken for the trapezius transversus (TT), rear deltoid (RD), latissimus dorsi (LD) and biceps brachii (BB). Mean sEMG amplitude and peak sEMG amplitude were analyzed. The LD showed significantly higher mean muscle excitation in the upper-half ROM compared to both the lower-half ROM (p < 0.001, d = - 0.59) and full ROM (p < 0.001, d = - 0.58). The TT exhibited significantly lower peak excitation in the upper-half ROM compared to the lower-half ROM (p = 0.042, d = 0.42) and full ROM (p = 0.013, d = 0.54). For the other muscles, no significant difference between the ROMs was found. The effect of ROM during the prone barbell row exercise on muscle excitation was of a medium magnitude only, as well as inconsistent, suggesting that ROM adjustments with standardized time under tension have limited impact on overall muscle activation.
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversity of Graz
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jelekin.2025.103025
dc.identifier.issn1050-6411
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105007767640
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2025.103025
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11452/56670
dc.identifier.volume83
dc.identifier.wos001511077200001
dc.indexed.wosWOS.SCI
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier sci ltd
dc.relation.journalJournal of electromyography and kinesiology
dc.subjectHorızontal abductıon
dc.subjectResıstance exercıse
dc.subjectSquat varıatıons
dc.subjectEmg actıvıty
dc.subjectActıvatıon
dc.subjectFull
dc.subjectLoad
dc.subjectRecruıtment
dc.subjectMaxımum
dc.subjectFront
dc.subjectResistance training
dc.subjectMuscle activation
dc.subjectElectromyography
dc.subjectRange of motion
dc.subjectTime under tension
dc.subjectEMG
dc.subjectScience & Technology
dc.subjectLife Sciences & Biomedicine
dc.subjectNeurosciences
dc.subjectPhysiology
dc.subjectRehabilitation
dc.subjectSport Sciences
dc.subjectNeurosciences & Neurology
dc.titleImpact of different ranges of motion in the prone barbell row on muscle excitation
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.departmentSpor Bilimleri Fakültesi/Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Ana Bilim Dalı
local.indexed.atWOS
local.indexed.atScopus

Dosyalar

Orijinal seri

Şimdi gösteriliyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
Ad:
Rodoplu_vd_2025.pdf
Boyut:
3.15 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format