Yayın:
De-escalation of nodal surgery in clinically node-positive breast cancer

dc.contributor.authorCabioglu, Neslihan
dc.contributor.authorKocer, Havva Belma
dc.contributor.authorKaranlik, Hasan
dc.contributor.authorGulcelik, Mehmet Ali
dc.contributor.authorIgci, Abdullah
dc.contributor.authorMuslumanoglu, Mahmut
dc.contributor.authorUras, Cihan
dc.contributor.authorMantoglu, Baris
dc.contributor.authorTrabulus, Didem Can
dc.contributor.authorAkguel, Giray
dc.contributor.authorTukenmez, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorSenol, Kazim
dc.contributor.authorOzkurt, Enver
dc.contributor.authorSen, Ebru
dc.contributor.authorKaradeniz Cakmak, Guldeniz
dc.contributor.authorBademler, Suleyman
dc.contributor.authorEmiroglu, Selman
dc.contributor.authorYildirim, Nilufer
dc.contributor.authorKara, Halil
dc.contributor.authorDag, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorDilege, Ece
dc.contributor.authorAltinok, Ayse
dc.contributor.authorBasaran, Gul
dc.contributor.authorVarol, Ecenur
dc.contributor.authorUgurlu, Umit
dc.contributor.authorBolukbasi, Yasemin
dc.contributor.authorErsoy, Yeliz Emine
dc.contributor.authorZengel, Baha
dc.contributor.authorKaraman, Niyazi
dc.contributor.authorOzbas, Serdar
dc.contributor.authorZer, Leyla
dc.contributor.authorKilic, Halime Gul
dc.contributor.authorAgcaoglu, Orhan
dc.contributor.authorSakman, Gurhan
dc.contributor.authorUtkan, Zafer
dc.contributor.authorSoyder, Aykut
dc.contributor.authorAkcan, Alper
dc.contributor.authorErgun, Sefa
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, Ravza
dc.contributor.authorAydiner, Adnan
dc.contributor.authorSoran, Atilla
dc.contributor.authorIbis, Kamuran
dc.contributor.authorOzmen, Vahit
dc.contributor.buuauthorŞENOL, KAZIM
dc.contributor.departmentTıp Fakültesi
dc.contributor.departmentGenel Cerrahi Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.contributor.researcheridJAC-4052-2023
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-21T10:07:04Z
dc.date.issued2025-01-02
dc.description.abstractImportance Increasing evidence supports the oncologic safety of de-escalating axillary surgery for patients with breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Objective To evaluate the oncologic outcomes of de-escalating axillary surgery among patients with clinically node (cN)-positive breast cancer and patients whose disease became cN negative after NAC (ycN negative). Design, Setting, and Participants In the NEOSENTITURK MF-1803 prospective cohort registry trial, patients from 37 centers with cT1-4N1-3M0 disease treated with sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) or targeted axillary dissection (TAD) alone or with ypN-negative or ypN-positive disease after NAC were recruited between February 15, 2019, and January 1, 2023, and evaluated. Exposure Treatment with SLNB or TAD after NAC. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary aim of the study was axillary, locoregional, or distant recurrence rates; disease-free survival; and disease-specific survival. Number of axillary lymph nodes removed was also evaluated. Results A total of 976 patients (median age, 46 years [range, 21-80 years]) with cT1-4N1-3M0 disease underwent SLNB (n = 620) or TAD alone (n = 356). Most of the cohort had a mapping procedure with blue dye alone (645 [66.1%]) with (n = 177) or without (n = 468) TAD. Overall, no difference was found between patients treated with TAD and patients treated with SLNB in the median number of total lymph nodes removed (TAD, 4 [3-6] vs SLNB, 4 [3-6]; P = .09). Among patients with ypN-positive disease, those who underwent TAD were more likely to have a lower median lymph node ratio (TAD, 0.28 [IQR, 0.20-0.40] vs SLNB, 0.33 [IQR, 0.20-0.50]; P = .03). At a median follow-up of 39 months (IQR, 29-48 months), no significant difference was found in the rates of ipsilateral axillary recurrence (0.3% [1 of 356] vs 0.3% [2 of 620]; P >= .99) or locoregional recurrence (0.6% [2 of 356] vs 1.1% [7 of 620]; P = .50) between the TAD and SLNB groups, with an overall locoregional recurrence rate of 0.9% (9 of 976). The initial clinical tumor stage, pathologic complete response, and use of blue dye alone as a mapping procedure were not associated with the outcome. Even though patients with TAD demonstrated an increased disease-free survival rate compared with the SLNB group, this difference did not reach statistical significance (94.9% vs 92.6%; P = .07). Factors associated with decreased 5-year disease-specific survival were cN2-3 axillary stage (cN1, 98.7% vs cN2-3, 96.8%; P = .03) and nonluminal type tumor pathologic characteristics (luminal, 98.9% vs nonluminal, 96.9%; P = .007). Conclusions and Relevance The short-term results suggest very low rates of axillary and locoregional recurrence in a select group of patients with cN-negative disease after NAC treated with TAD alone or SLNB alone followed by regional nodal irradiation regardless of the SLNB technique or nodal pathology. Whether TAD might provide a clear survival advantage compared with SLNB remains to be proven in studies with longer follow-up.
dc.identifier.doi10.1001/jamasurg.2024.5913
dc.identifier.endpage266
dc.identifier.issn2168-6254
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85217626847
dc.identifier.startpage257
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2024.5913
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11452/56356
dc.identifier.volume160
dc.identifier.wos001389480800001
dc.indexed.wosWOS.SCI
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAmerican Medical Association
dc.relation.journalJama Surgery
dc.subjectNeoadjuvant chemotherapy
dc.subjectSentinel-node
dc.subjectAxillary dissection
dc.subjectBiopsy
dc.subjectMulticenter
dc.subjectSurgery
dc.subjectScience & Technology
dc.subjectLife Sciences & Biomedicine
dc.titleDe-escalation of nodal surgery in clinically node-positive breast cancer
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.departmentTıp Fakültesi/Genel Cerrahi Ana Bilim Dalı
local.indexed.atWOS
local.indexed.atScopus
relation.isAuthorOfPublication9bebfccf-676e-4cad-a8bc-2fdca148d337
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery9bebfccf-676e-4cad-a8bc-2fdca148d337

Dosyalar