Publication:
Geometric morphometric analysis of the pharyngeal airway during treatment of class III malocclusion

dc.contributor.authorKaygısız, Emine
dc.contributor.authorKurnaz, Merve
dc.contributor.authorYüksel, Sema
dc.contributor.authorTortop, Tuba
dc.contributor.buuauthorOcakoğlu, Gökhan
dc.contributor.buuauthorOCAKOĞLU, GÖKHAN
dc.contributor.departmentTıp Fakültesi
dc.contributor.departmentBiyoistatistik Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.contributor.researcheridHLG-6346-2023
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-21T12:36:20Z
dc.date.available2024-11-21T12:36:20Z
dc.date.issued2022-09-01
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The pharyngeal airway is important during diagnosis and treatment planning in orthodontics. This study aimed to compare the changes in the shape of the pharyngeal airway in patients with Class III malocclusion treated with a facemask (FM) with a removable maxillary appliance and modified tandem traction bow appliance (MTTBA). Methods: This study consisted of pretreatment and posttreatment lateral cephalograms of 35 subjects with skeletal and dental Class III malocclusion. In the first group, 20 patients (12 males, 8 females; mean age, 10.2 years) were treated with MTTBA. The mean treatment time was 12 months. In the second group, 15 patients (10 males, 5 females; mean age, 10.3 years) were treated with FM. The mean treatment time was 11.7 months. Nineteen pharyngeal landmarks were considered from the image corresponding to the midsagittal plane and marked using tpsDig software (version 2.04; Stony Brook, NY). Pharyngeal airway shape difference between the groups was assessed by performing a Generalized Procrustes analysis. The shape deformation of the pharyngeal airway from the pre- to posttreatment periods was evaluated using the thin-plate spline method. Results: There were no differences between MTTBA and FM groups according to airway shape for pretreatment and posttreatment periods. However, there were some deformities using the enlargement of the nasopharyngeal area in the FM group and oropharyngeal area in the MTTBA group according to pretreatment periods. Conclusions: There were no differences between the groups according to the mean pharyngeal airway shapes when the posttreatment periods of the FM and MTTBA groups were examined.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.04.028
dc.identifier.endpage385
dc.identifier.issn0889-5406
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85129550957
dc.identifier.startpage374
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.04.028
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11452/48301
dc.identifier.volume162
dc.identifier.wos000896338300019
dc.indexed.wosWOS.SCI
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMosby-elsevier
dc.relation.journalAmerican Journal Of Orthodontics And Dentofacial Orthopedics
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectMaxillary protraction
dc.subjectFacemask therapy
dc.subjectOrthognathic surgery
dc.subjectDimensions
dc.subjectExpansion
dc.subjectAgenesis
dc.subjectPosition
dc.subjectSpace
dc.subjectSize
dc.subjectScience & technology
dc.subjectLife sciences & biomedicine
dc.subjectDentistry, oral surgery & medicine
dc.titleGeometric morphometric analysis of the pharyngeal airway during treatment of class III malocclusion
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.departmentTıp Fakültesi/Biyoistatistik Ana Bilim Dalı
local.indexed.atWOS
local.indexed.atScopus
relation.isAuthorOfPublication8ff963e8-284c-49e2-99b9-a46777690e8c
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery8ff963e8-284c-49e2-99b9-a46777690e8c

Files