Yayın:
Long-term follow-up of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: Comparison of two different techniques used in urology and gynecology

dc.contributor.buuauthorOrhan, Adnan
dc.contributor.buuauthorÖzerkan, Kemal
dc.contributor.buuauthorVuruskan, Hakan
dc.contributor.buuauthorOcakoğlu, Gökhan
dc.contributor.buuauthorKasapoğlu, Işıl
dc.contributor.buuauthorKoşan, Bahadır
dc.contributor.buuauthorUncu, Gürkan
dc.contributor.departmentTıp Fakültesi
dc.contributor.departmentKadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-7558-8166
dc.contributor.researcheridV-5292-2019
dc.contributor.researcheridAAI-1958-2021
dc.contributor.researcheridAAT-3479-2021
dc.contributor.researcheridAAH-9791-2021
dc.contributor.researcheridHLG-6346-2023
dc.contributor.researcheridAAH-5180-2021
dc.contributor.scopusid56671094200
dc.contributor.scopusid6603345841
dc.contributor.scopusid6507328150
dc.contributor.scopusid15832295800
dc.contributor.scopusid55800494800
dc.contributor.scopusid57205391969
dc.contributor.scopusid6603716169
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-18T12:53:25Z
dc.date.available2023-10-18T12:53:25Z
dc.date.issued2019-04
dc.description.abstractIntroduction and hypothesisNumerous studies have found that the short-term results of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse are safe and effective. This study evaluates the long-term results of the laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy operation between the urology and gynecology branches.MethodsA prospective study enrolling 206 patients was conducted to evaluate laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy as a surgical treatment for vaginal vault prolapse from 2011 to 2014. Two different surgical branches (urology and gynecology) applied laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy to their patients with their own techniques. The long-term results were assessed postoperatively after 4years by pelvic examinations, including the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system (POP-Q) and quality-of-life assessments using validated questionnaires.ResultsA total of 190 patients (94 urology and 96 gynecology patients) received a full clinical follow-up examination between April 2014-June 2018. Postoperative pelvic organ prolapse recurrence rates in each compartment were similar in both groups during the 4years; 87.2% of the urology and 86.5% of the gynecology patients had no prolapse in any compartment according to the POP-Q system. The reoperation rate was 5.3% for the urology and 6.2% for the gynecology group. Mesh erosion was detected in two patients in both groups. Three patients responded to local estrogen therapy, and we removed the mesh vaginally in one patient. The subjective cure rate was 89.4% in the urology and 88.5% in the gynecology group after 4years.ConclusionsAlthough different surgical branches perform laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with their own techniques, long-term anatomical and functional results are similar between the branches. From a urogynecological point of view, laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy is a gold standard surgical procedure that can be performed by both urologists and gynecologists with similar long-term outcomes.
dc.identifier.citationOrhan, A. (2019). "Long-term follow-up of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: comparison of two different techniques used in urology and gynecology". International Urogynecology Journal, 30(4), 623-632.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00192-018-03858-w
dc.identifier.endpage632
dc.identifier.issn0937-3462
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.pubmed30627828
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85059866866
dc.identifier.startpage623
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-03858-w
dc.identifier.urihttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00192-018-03858-w
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11452/34433
dc.identifier.volume30
dc.identifier.wos000463705300014
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.collaborationYurt içi
dc.relation.journalInternational Urogynecology Journal
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectLaparoscopic sacrocolpopexy
dc.subjectLong-term follow-up
dc.subjectGynecology
dc.subjectUrology
dc.subjectVaginal vault prolapse
dc.subjectAbdominal sacrocolpopexy
dc.subjectRobotic sacrocolpopexy
dc.subjectHysterectomy
dc.subjectOutcomes
dc.subjectSurgery
dc.subjectRepair
dc.subjectWomen
dc.subjectCost
dc.subjectMesh
dc.subjectObstetrics & gynecology
dc.subjectUrology & nephrology
dc.subject.emtreeEstrogen
dc.subject.emtreeAdult
dc.subject.emtreeArticle
dc.subject.emtreeCohort analysis
dc.subject.emtreeConstipation
dc.subject.emtreeControlled study
dc.subject.emtreeEstrogen therapy
dc.subject.emtreeFemale
dc.subject.emtreeFollow up
dc.subject.emtreeHuman
dc.subject.emtreeIntermethod comparison
dc.subject.emtreeLaparoscopic surgery
dc.subject.emtreeMajor clinical study
dc.subject.emtreeMicturition disorder
dc.subject.emtreeMiddle aged
dc.subject.emtreePelvic organ prolapse quantification
dc.subject.emtreePostoperative complication
dc.subject.emtreePriority journal
dc.subject.emtreeProspective study
dc.subject.emtreeQuality of life assessment
dc.subject.emtreeRecurrence risk
dc.subject.emtreeReoperation
dc.subject.emtreeSacrocolpopexy
dc.subject.emtreeStress incontinence
dc.subject.emtreeTreatment response
dc.subject.emtreeUrge incontinence
dc.subject.emtreeVaginal vault prolapse
dc.subject.emtreeAdverse device effect
dc.subject.meshFemale
dc.subject.meshFollow-up studies
dc.subject.meshGynecology
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshLaparoscopy
dc.subject.meshMiddle aged
dc.subject.meshPelvic organ prolapse
dc.subject.meshPostoperative complications
dc.subject.meshQuality of life
dc.subject.meshRecurrence
dc.subject.meshReoperation
dc.subject.meshSacrum
dc.subject.meshSurgical mesh
dc.subject.meshTime factors
dc.subject.meshTreatment outcome
dc.subject.meshUrology
dc.subject.meshVagina
dc.subject.scopusSacrocolpopexy; Pelvis Floor; Hymen
dc.subject.wosObstetrics & gynecology
dc.subject.wosUrology & nephrology
dc.titleLong-term follow-up of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: Comparison of two different techniques used in urology and gynecology
dc.typeArticle
dc.wos.quartileN/A
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.departmentTıp Fakültesi/Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum Ana Bilim Dalı
local.indexed.atPubMed
local.indexed.atWOS
local.indexed.atScopus

Dosyalar

Lisanslı seri

Şimdi gösteriliyor 1 - 1 / 1
Placeholder
Ad:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama