Publication:
Sufficiency of youtube videos as a source of information in kidney transplantation

dc.contributor.author
dc.contributor.buuauthorPEHLİVAN, SEDA
dc.contributor.buuauthorORUÇ, AYŞEGÜL
dc.contributor.buuauthorVATANSEVER, NURSEL
dc.contributor.buuauthorVatansever, Nursel
dc.contributor.buuauthorOruç, Ayşegül
dc.contributor.buuauthorYILDIZ, ABDULMECİT
dc.contributor.buuauthorYıldız, Abdülmecit
dc.contributor.departmentTıp Fakültesi
dc.contributor.departmentNefroloji Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-1670-0672
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-0342-9692
dc.contributor.researcheridAAI-9108-2021
dc.contributor.researcheridABG-1164-2020
dc.contributor.researcheridB-5037-2017
dc.contributor.researcheridAAH-4002-2021
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-07T05:20:54Z
dc.date.available2024-10-07T05:20:54Z
dc.date.issued2018-01-01
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: It was evaluated the sufficiency of YouTube videos related with kidney transplantation as a source of information in this study.MATERIAL and METHODS: A search was made on YouTube web site on 01.09.2015 with the "kidney transplantation" keyword. Videos were evaluated by two nephrology specialists experienced in kidney transplantation. Scores (between 0 and 10) for "reliability", "quality", "usefulness" were given to each video content during expert evaluation. Chi-square, Mann-Whitney U, and Kruskal-Wallis analyses were carried out for the evaluation of the acquired data using SPSS 20.0.RESULTS: It was determined that 10% of the videos included in the study contained misleading information. It was determined that the videos which have received the highest number of views were on herbal products, surgical intervention and religious knowledge videos respectively (p<0.05). When the distribution of evaluated score averages with regard to the source uploading the video was considered, statistically significant differences were determined in all areas (p<0.05).CONCLUSION: Even though there is information on YouTube related with kidney transplantation, there are also videos that include misleading and unprofessional information. It is thought that healthcare professionals have significant responsibilities for ensuring that videos with reliable content are available in social media.
dc.identifier.doi10.5262/tndt.2017.1003.23
dc.identifier.endpage43
dc.identifier.issn1300-7718
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.startpage39
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5262/tndt.2017.1003.23
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11452/45913
dc.identifier.volume27
dc.identifier.wos000425163400005
dc.indexed.wosWOS.ESCI
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTurk Nefroloji Diyaliz Transplantasyon Dergisi
dc.relation.journalTurkish Nephrology Dialysis And Transplantation Journal
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectDisease
dc.subjectTurkey
dc.subjectKidney transplantation
dc.subjectPatient information
dc.subjectSocial media
dc.subjectYoutube
dc.subjectScience & technology
dc.subjectLife sciences & biomedicine
dc.subjectUrology & nephrology
dc.titleSufficiency of youtube videos as a source of information in kidney transplantation
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.departmentTıp Fakültesi/Nefroloji Ana Bilim Dalı
local.contributor.departmentSağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi/Hemşirelik Ana Bilim Dalı
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationb0d5c112-464d-427b-836a-66862ff5cb24
relation.isAuthorOfPublication6abdcf15-3c9a-49ef-a054-c5dee803a05f
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationbd386ce4-0765-45b7-9a09-c10b5eca584a
relation.isAuthorOfPublicatione0f20ddb-a439-4c4a-b87e-d468370abf60
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery6abdcf15-3c9a-49ef-a054-c5dee803a05f

Files

Collections