Yayın: Evaluating the capability of uav-derived dems for flood hazard analysis
| dc.contributor.buuauthor | ÖZDEMİR, HASAN | |
| dc.contributor.buuauthor | AKBAŞ, ABDULLAH | |
| dc.contributor.department | Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi | |
| dc.contributor.department | Coğrafya Ana Bilim Dalı | |
| dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0001-8885-9298 | |
| dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0003-2024-0565 | |
| dc.contributor.researcherid | AAI-6814-2021 | |
| dc.contributor.researcherid | Y-4236-2018 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-10-14T06:28:11Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-02-25 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This study evaluates the flood extent, depth, velocity, and flood hazard analyses across 100, 500, and 1000 return periods using 0.1 m, 0.5 m, and 1 m DEM data derived from Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV). The Ulus settlement (T & uuml;rkiye) was selected as the case study area. The primary input data include DEMs produced from the DJI Mavic 2 Pro drone and flood flows derived from the SWAT rainfall-runoff model for the Ulus River and its tributaries. Flood hazard analyses were conducted using the 2D LISFLOOD-FP hydrodynamic model using a constant Manning n value (n = 0.035) to evaluate spatial resolution variability. The findings indicate that as the resolution improves from 1 m to 0.1 m, the model runtime increases significantly (711 times on average), as do average calculation errors. Meanwhile, the spatial distribution of flood extent and hazard classes for people decreases by approximately 0.7% to 9%. However, the differences between resolutions from 0.1 m to 1 m in terms of depth, velocity, and inundation extent are not substantial. Therefore, using a 0.1 m UAV DEM resolution is not cost-effective, especially for large areas, due to the increased model instability caused by surface roughness and the longer processing time required. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/02723646.2025.2467912 | |
| dc.identifier.endpage | 195 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0272-3646 | |
| dc.identifier.issue | 3 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85218674478 | |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 175 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1080/02723646.2025.2467912 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11452/55540 | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 46 | |
| dc.identifier.wos | 001468041700001 | |
| dc.indexed.wos | WOS.SCI | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis | |
| dc.relation.bap | OUAP(F)-2019/13 | |
| dc.relation.journal | Physical geography | |
| dc.subject | Unmanned aerıal vehıcles | |
| dc.subject | Topographıc data | |
| dc.subject | System | |
| dc.subject | Model | |
| dc.subject | Risk | |
| dc.subject | Resolutıon | |
| dc.subject | Accuracy | |
| dc.subject | Photogrammetry | |
| dc.subject | Uncertaınty | |
| dc.subject | Landslıde | |
| dc.subject | Unmanned Aerial Vehicle | |
| dc.subject | Sub-meter digital elevation model | |
| dc.subject | Flood hazard | |
| dc.subject | Lisflood-FP | |
| dc.subject | Ulus River | |
| dc.subject | Science & Technology | |
| dc.subject | Life Sciences & Biomedicine | |
| dc.subject | Physical Sciences | |
| dc.subject | Environmental Sciences | |
| dc.subject | Geography, Physical | |
| dc.subject | Geosciences, Multidisciplinary | |
| dc.subject | Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences | |
| dc.subject | Environmental Sciences & Ecology | |
| dc.subject | Physical Geography | |
| dc.subject | Geology | |
| dc.subject | Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences | |
| dc.title | Evaluating the capability of uav-derived dems for flood hazard analysis | |
| dc.type | Article | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| local.contributor.department | Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi/Coğrafya Ana Bilim Dalı | |
| local.indexed.at | WOS | |
| local.indexed.at | Scopus | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication | c1965f59-d207-4cbe-abf5-566d81db51ec | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication | d163aa44-8100-4aeb-8113-639868e48722 | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | c1965f59-d207-4cbe-abf5-566d81db51ec |
Dosyalar
Orijinal seri
1 - 1 / 1
