Publication:
Do lactobacillus rhamnosus-originated probiotic and parabiotic have inhibitory effects on intraocular lens biofilm?

dc.contributor.authorKıvanç, Sertaç Argün
dc.contributor.authorAkova, Berna
dc.contributor.authorKıvanç, Merih
dc.contributor.buuauthorKIVANÇ, SERTAÇ ARGUN
dc.contributor.buuauthorAKOVA, BERNA
dc.contributor.departmentTıp Fakültesi
dc.contributor.departmentGöz Hastalıkları Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.contributor.researcheridLLU-8321-2024
dc.contributor.researcheridHPQ-1461-2023
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-07T13:10:21Z
dc.date.available2025-01-07T13:10:21Z
dc.date.issued2022-01-01
dc.description.abstractObjective: Our aim was to investigate the formation of Staphylococcus (S.) epidermidis biofilm on hydrophobic acrylic lenses and whether the inhibition of the formed biofilm is possible with probiotic Lactobacillus (L.) rhamnosus 312 and parabiotic prepared from it. Materials and Methods: The probiotic bacteria L. rhamnosus 312 and intercellular adhesion (ICA) gene-positive tested bacteria S. epidermidis KA15.8 were used in the study from stock. To obtain the parabiotic the cultures were developed in De Man Rogosa and Sharpe (MRS) broth for 48 hours and autoclaved at 121 degrees C for 15 minutes. Biofilms on hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses and the antibiofilm effects of parabiotic and probiotic L. rhamnosus were evaluated. Scanning electron microscopy photos of biofilms produced on intraocular lenses (IOLs) were taken. Results: Probiotic L. rhamnosus 312 and the parabiotic test showed antibacterial activity on test bacteria, ICA positive S. epidermidis KA15.8. . However, the probiotic L. rhamnosus 312 zone diameter was found to be wider. After the biofilm was formed, the addition of parabiotic inhibited the biofilm formed by S. epidermis KA15.8 by 58.29%. The number of S. epidermidis KA15.8 in the biofilm also decreased. Conclusion: Parabiotic and probiotic L. rhamnosus 312 was found effective for its antibiofilm effect. However, further studies with different concentrations are needed.
dc.description.sponsorshipAnadolu Üniversitesi - 1404F202
dc.identifier.doi10.26650/experimed.1172749
dc.identifier.eissn2667-5846
dc.identifier.endpage107
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85173985098
dc.identifier.startpage103
dc.identifier.urihttps://iupress.istanbul.edu.tr/en/journal/experimed/article/do-lactobacillus-rhamnosus-originated-probiotic-and-parabiotic-have-inhibitory-effects-on-intraocular-lens-biofilm
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11452/49359
dc.identifier.volume12
dc.identifier.wos001325430100001
dc.indexed.wosWOS.ESCI
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherİstanbul Üniversitesi
dc.relation.journalExperimed
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectProbiotic
dc.subjectParabiotic
dc.subjectOphthalmology
dc.subjectCataract
dc.subjectIntraocular lens
dc.subjectBiofilm
dc.subjectScience & technology
dc.subjectLife sciences & biomedicine
dc.subjectMedicine, research & experimental
dc.subjectResearch & experimental medicine
dc.subjectStaphylococcus-epidermidis
dc.subjectCataract-surgery
dc.subjectEndophthalmitis survey
dc.subjectBacterial biofilms
dc.subjectIca locus
dc.subjectAdherence
dc.subjectPostbiotics
dc.subjectResistance
dc.subjectAureus
dc.subjectTerm
dc.titleDo lactobacillus rhamnosus-originated probiotic and parabiotic have inhibitory effects on intraocular lens biofilm?
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.departmentTıp Fakültesi/Göz Hastalıkları Ana Bilim Dalı
local.indexed.atWOS
local.indexed.atScopus
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationc34828fa-eda6-42fd-a25f-67d0b219d1bb
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationb7feedf4-b84d-41a1-aa2e-50bbc3f4303f
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryc34828fa-eda6-42fd-a25f-67d0b219d1bb

Files