Çağdaş mantıkçı anlam kuramında dil-dünya ilişkisi ve metafiziğin yadsınması
Date
2016
Authors
Çelebi, Vedat
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Uludağ Üniversitesi
Abstract
Mantıkçı anlam kuramının temel amacı gündelik dilden kaynaklanan belirsizlikleri, çok anlamlılığı ortadan kaldırmak ve biçimsel bir dil oluşturmaktır. Mantıkçı anlam kuramının dil-dünya uygunluğunu esas alan mantıksal atomcu yaklaşımı, dildeki tek tek bütün anlam birimlerinin dünyadaki şeylere karşılık geldiğini, dildeki her sözcüğün bir şeye, her önermeninse belli bir olgu bağlamına gönderme yaptığını savunan anlam görüşüdür. Bu noktada mantıkçı anlam kuramı çerçevesinde değerlendireceğimiz kendilerine Viyana Çevresi filozofları da denen mantıkçı pozitivistler, önermeler arasında ayrım yaparak; metafizik önerme ve kavramların anlamdan yoksun olduğunu iddia ederler. Çünkü onlara göre, yalnızca kesin olarak doğrulanabilen önermeler anlamlı olabilir. Buradan hareketle anlam sorununun gerçekte bir doğruluk sorunu olduğu sonucuna varmışlardır. Sonuç olarak bu makalede, mantıkçı anlam kuramının dil-dünya ilişkisi ve metafizik eleştirisi mantıksal atomcu ve mantıkçı pozitivist yaklaşımlarından hareketle değerlendirilecektir.
The main goal of the theory of logical meaning is to eliminate polysemy, uncertainties resulting from the ordinary language and create formally a perfect language. This approach based on language- world suitability is meaning conception defending that one by one all of the meaning units in language corresponds to something in the world, each word in language refers to something, and each proposition makes reference to a certain state of affairs. Logical positivists, who are also named as Vienna circle philosophers, we evaluate within the frame of the theory of logical meaning, claim that metaphysical proposition and concepts are deprived of meaning considering the distinction they made between the propositions. Because, according to them, only definitely verifiable propositions can be meaningful. The most distinctive feature of this line of thought is that the proposition which makes a proposition meaningful is verifiable in principle. From this point of view, they concluded that the meaning problem is an accuracy problem in fact. In this paper, critique of metaphysics and language- world relation of the theory of logical meaning will be evaluated from the approach of logical atomistic and logical positivists.
The main goal of the theory of logical meaning is to eliminate polysemy, uncertainties resulting from the ordinary language and create formally a perfect language. This approach based on language- world suitability is meaning conception defending that one by one all of the meaning units in language corresponds to something in the world, each word in language refers to something, and each proposition makes reference to a certain state of affairs. Logical positivists, who are also named as Vienna circle philosophers, we evaluate within the frame of the theory of logical meaning, claim that metaphysical proposition and concepts are deprived of meaning considering the distinction they made between the propositions. Because, according to them, only definitely verifiable propositions can be meaningful. The most distinctive feature of this line of thought is that the proposition which makes a proposition meaningful is verifiable in principle. From this point of view, they concluded that the meaning problem is an accuracy problem in fact. In this paper, critique of metaphysics and language- world relation of the theory of logical meaning will be evaluated from the approach of logical atomistic and logical positivists.
Description
Keywords
Anlam kuramı, Dil-dünya ilişkisi, Anlamlılık, Doğrulanabilirlik ilkesi, Metafizik eleştirisi, Theory of meaning, Language-world relation, Meaningfulness, Principle of verifiability, Critique of metaphysics
Citation
Çelebi, V. (2016). "Çağdaş mantıkçı anlam kuramında dil-dünya ilişkisi ve metafiziğin yadsınması". Kaygı. Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi, 26, 69-84.