The effectiveness of the low-power laser and kinesiotaping in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome, a pilot study

dc.contributor.authorGüner, Altuğ
dc.contributor.authorAksoy, Meliha Kasapoğlu
dc.contributor.buuauthorAltan, Lale
dc.contributor.departmentUludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Anabilim Dalı.tr_TR
dc.contributor.researcheridAAH-1652-2021tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid6603281363tr_TR
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-27T06:34:24Z
dc.date.available2024-03-27T06:34:24Z
dc.date.issued2018-05
dc.description.abstractIn mild and moderate cases of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), the conservative approach is suggested. The purpose of this study is to assess and compare the effect of low-power laser versus the combination of low-power laser and kinesiotaping on pain, muscle strength, functionality, and electrophysiologic parameters in the patients with CTS. The study was planned as single-blind, prospective, randomized control. 64 hands diagnosed with CTS were included in the study. The patients were randomly divided into three groups by closed envelope method. Low-power laser therapy was applied to Group 1 (21 hands), kinesiotaping and low-power laser therapy in group 2 (22 hands), sham laser therapy in Group 3 (21 hands). All patients were assessed by visual numeric pain scale (VNS), hand grip strength (HGS), finger pinch strength (FPS), the Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (BCTSQ), before treatment, after treatment (3rd week), and after (12th week) 3 months the treatment with the same physician. Motor and sensory nerve conduction studies were performed with electroneuromyography (ENMG) before the treatment (0th week) and at the end of the 12th week. Comparison of the group 1 with the group 3 showed significantly better improvement in the former in VNS, BCTSQ at 3rd week and 12th week compared to 0th week, and in FPS and HGS at 3rd week. Comparison of the group 2 with the group 3 showed significantly better improvement in the former VNS, BCTSQ, FPS and HGS at 3rd and 12th week compared to 0th week. When Group 1 and Group 2 were compared there was no statistically significant difference in any parameters in the 3rd week, but there was a statistically significant difference in favor of group 2 in FPS and HGS parameters at the 12th week. We have found that the kinesiotaping method applied with low-power laser treatment does not provide any additional benefit to the low-power laser treatment in the short term, however, in the long term, the increase in the HGS and FPS has occurred. In conclusion, low-power laser and kinesiotaping method in the treatment of CTS may be an effective and reliable treatment option in clinical parameters.tr_TR
dc.identifier.citationGüner, A. vd. (2018). ''The effectiveness of the low-power laser and kinesiotaping in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome, a pilot study''. Rheumatology International, 38(5), 895-904.tr_TR
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-018-4020-6
dc.identifier.endpage904tr_TR
dc.identifier.issn0172-8172
dc.identifier.issn1437-160X
dc.identifier.issue5tr_TR
dc.identifier.pubmed29594333tr_TR
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85044474668tr_TR
dc.identifier.startpage895tr_TR
dc.identifier.urihttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00296-018-4020-6
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11452/40631
dc.identifier.volume38tr_TR
dc.identifier.wos000430547600021tr_TR
dc.indexed.pubmedPubMedtr_TR
dc.indexed.scopusScopus
dc.indexed.wosSCIE
dc.language.isoentr_TR
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.collaborationSanayi
dc.relation.journalRheumatology Internationaltr_TR
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergitr_TR
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccesstr_TR
dc.subjectRheumatologytr_TR
dc.subjectCarpal tunnel syndrometr_TR
dc.subjectLow-power lasertr_TR
dc.subjectKinesiotapingtr_TR
dc.subjectNervetr_TR
dc.subjectStrengthtr_TR
dc.subjectReliabilitytr_TR
dc.subjectTherapytr_TR
dc.subjectGriptr_TR
dc.subjectRattr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeAdulttr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeArticletr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeBoston carpal tunnel syndrome questionnairetr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeCarpal tunnel questionnairetr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeCarpal tunnel syndrometr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeClinical assessmenttr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeClinical effectivenesstr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeComparative studytr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeControlled studytr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeElectromyographytr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeElectroneurographytr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeErythematr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeFemaletr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeFunctional statustr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeGrip strengthtr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeHand griptr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeHumantr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeKinesiotapingtr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeLow level laser therapytr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeMajor clinical studytr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeMaletr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeMiddle agedtr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeMotor nerve conductiontr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeMuscle strengthtr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeNumeric rating scaletr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeOutcome assessmenttr_TR
dc.subject.emtreePaintr_TR
dc.subject.emtreePain assessmenttr_TR
dc.subject.emtreePilot studytr_TR
dc.subject.emtreePinch strengthtr_TR
dc.subject.emtreePriority journaltr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeProspective studytr_TR
dc.subject.emtreePruritustr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeQuality of lifetr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeRandomized controlled trialtr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeSensory nerve conductiontr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeSingle blind proceduretr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeSkin irritationtr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeStatistical significancetr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeAdverse device effecttr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeAthletic tapetr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeCarpal tunnel syndrometr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeConvalescencetr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeDevicestr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeDiode lasertr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeDrug therapytr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeLow level laser therapytr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeMultimodality cancer therapytr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeNerve conductiontr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeNeurologic examinationtr_TR
dc.subject.emtreePain measurementtr_TR
dc.subject.emtreePathophysiologytr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeTime factortr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeTreatment outcometr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeTurkey (bird)tr_TR
dc.subject.meshAdulttr_TR
dc.subject.meshAthletic tapetr_TR
dc.subject.meshCarpal tunnel syndrometr_TR
dc.subject.meshCombined modality therapytr_TR
dc.subject.meshFemaletr_TR
dc.subject.meshHumanstr_TR
dc.subject.meshLasers, semiconductortr_TR
dc.subject.meshLow-level light therapytr_TR
dc.subject.meshMaletr_TR
dc.subject.meshMiddle agedtr_TR
dc.subject.meshNeural conductiontr_TR
dc.subject.meshNeurologic examinationtr_TR
dc.subject.meshPain measurementtr_TR
dc.subject.meshPilot projectstr_TR
dc.subject.meshPinch strengthtr_TR
dc.subject.meshProspective studiestr_TR
dc.subject.meshRecovery of functiontr_TR
dc.subject.meshSingle-blind methodtr_TR
dc.subject.meshTime factorstr_TR
dc.subject.meshTreatment outcometr_TR
dc.subject.meshTurkeytr_TR
dc.subject.scopusAthletic Tape; Low Back Pain; Randomized Controlled Trialtr_TR
dc.subject.wosRheumatologytr_TR
dc.titleThe effectiveness of the low-power laser and kinesiotaping in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome, a pilot studytr_TR
dc.typeArticletr_TR

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections