Feature-positive and feature-negative learning in honey bees

dc.contributor.authorAbramson, Charles I.
dc.contributor.authorDuell, Meghan E.
dc.contributor.authorBates-Albers, Leah M.
dc.contributor.authorZuniga, Enoc M.
dc.contributor.authorPendegraft, Loma
dc.contributor.authorBarnett, Amanda
dc.contributor.authorCowo, Carmen L.
dc.contributor.authorWarren, Joshua J.
dc.contributor.authorAlbritton-Ford, Aaron C.
dc.contributor.authorWells, Harrington
dc.contributor.buuauthorÇakmak, İbrahim
dc.contributor.departmentUludağ Üniversitesi/Mustafakemalpaşa Meslek Yüksekokulu/Arıcılık Araştırma Merkezi.tr_TR
dc.contributor.researcheridAAH-2558-2021tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid57207796431tr_TR
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-25T09:35:29Z
dc.date.available2024-01-25T09:35:29Z
dc.date.issued2012-09-10
dc.description.abstractHoney bees (Apis mellifera anatolica) were subjected to sequential trials where they were given the choice between a featurepositive and a feature-negative feeding plate. The 'feature' being manipulated is the presence of a single blue circle among three circles marking the location of a small sucrose reward. That is, a 'feature-negative' target had three white circles, while a 'featurepositive' target had two white circles and one blue one. Two experiments were performed. In both experiments, each bee was tested under two different reward scenarios (treatments). In the first experiment, during the feature-positive treatment bees received 4 μl of 2 mol l-1 sucrose when choosing the feature-positive plate, but received 4 μl of saturated NaCl solution (saltwater) when choosing the feature-negative plate. During the feature-negative treatment, bees were rewarded when visiting the featurenegative plate, while visitation to the feature-positive plate only offered bees the saltwater. The second experiment was a repeat of the first except that pure water was offered instead of saltwater in the non-rewarding feeding plate. As an experimental control, a set of bees was offered sequential trials where both the feature-positive and feature-negative plates offered the sucrose reward. Bee feeding plate choice differed between the feature-positive and feature-negative treatments in both experiments. Bees favored the feeding plate type with the sucrose reward in each treatment, and never consumed the saltwater or pure water when encountered in either treatment. Further, behavior of bees during both the feature-positive and feature-negative treatments differed from that of control bees. However, neither feature-positive nor feature-negative learning reached high levels of success. Further, a feature-positive effect was seen when pure water was offered; bees learned to solve the feature-positive problem more rapidly. When we tested bees using simply the choice of blue versus white targets, where one color held the sucrose reward and the other the saltwater, a bee's fidelity to the color offering the sucrose reward quickly reached very high levels.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Science Foundation (NSF) - DBI0851651en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversity of Central Oklahoma's Office of Academic Affairsen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Science Foundation (NSF) - NSF - Directorate for STEM Education (EDU) - 0902027en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Science Foundation (NSF) - NSF - Directorate for Biological Sciences (BIO) - 1263327en_US
dc.identifier.citationAbramson, C. vd. (2013). ''Feature-positive and feature-negative learning in honey bees''. Journal of Experimental Biology, 216(2), 224-229.en_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.069088
dc.identifier.eissn1477-9145
dc.identifier.endpage229tr_TR
dc.identifier.issn0022-0949
dc.identifier.issue2tr_TR
dc.identifier.pubmed22996443tr_TR
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84871741459tr_TR
dc.identifier.startpage224tr_TR
dc.identifier.urihttps://journals.biologists.com/jeb/article/216/2/224/11638/Feature-positive-and-feature-negative-learning-in
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11452/39319
dc.identifier.volume216tr_TR
dc.identifier.wos000312735700018tr_TR
dc.indexed.pubmedPubMeden_US
dc.indexed.wosSCIEen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCompany Biologistsen_US
dc.relation.collaborationYurt dışıtr_TR
dc.relation.collaborationSanayitr_TR
dc.relation.journalJournal of Experimental Biologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergitr_TR
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectLife sciences & biomedicine - other topicsen_US
dc.subjectApis melliferaen_US
dc.subjectFeature-positiveen_US
dc.subjectFeature-negativeen_US
dc.subjectDiscrimination conditioningen_US
dc.subjectProboscis extensionen_US
dc.subjectFlower constancyen_US
dc.subjectApis-melliferaen_US
dc.subjectPatternsen_US
dc.subjectTimeen_US
dc.subjectApoideaen_US
dc.subjectAnatolicaen_US
dc.subject.emtreeAnimalen_US
dc.subject.emtreeArticleen_US
dc.subject.emtreeBeeen_US
dc.subject.emtreeFeeding behavioren_US
dc.subject.emtreeInstrumental conditioningen_US
dc.subject.emtreePhysiologyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeRewarden_US
dc.subject.meshAnimalsen_US
dc.subject.meshBeesen_US
dc.subject.meshConditioning, operanten_US
dc.subject.meshFeeding behavioren_US
dc.subject.meshRewarden_US
dc.subject.scopusAnimals; Honeybee; Apis Melliferaen_US
dc.subject.wosBiologyen_US
dc.titleFeature-positive and feature-negative learning in honey beesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.wos.quartileQ1 (Biology)en_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Abramson_vd_2013.pdf
Size:
342.27 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections