Yayın: Improving conception rate in lactating dairy cows by using modified ovsynch protocol during summer
Dosyalar
Tarih
Kurum Yazarları
Mecitoglu, Gulnaz Yılmazbas
Gumen, Ahmet
Keskın, Abdulkadir
Karakaya, Ebru
Yazarlar
Tasdemir, Umut
Alkan, Ali
Okut, Hayrettin
Danışman
Dil
Türü
Yayıncı:
Uludağ Üniversitesi
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Özet
The aim of this study was to test two different timed artificial insemination (AI) protocols in order to improve the percentage of pregnant cows per AI in lactating dairy cows during the summer. Cows (n=140) were randomly divided into two groups; cows in the OVS group (n=75) received the Ovsynch protocol (GnRH–7d–PGF2α–2d–GnRH–16h–AI), and cows in the MOVS group (n=65) received the Ovsynch protocol with exogenous progesterone (P4) which administrated between GnRH and PGF2α. In addition, GnRH was injected 7 d after AI in the MOVS group (GnRH–P4–7d –PGF2α–2d–GnRH–16h–AI–7d–GnRH). Response to the second GnRH treatment of Ovsynch (GnRH-2) was greater (P<0.03) in the MOVS (98.5%) than the OVS (89.3%) group. Although P/AI at 31 d was numerically greater in the MOVS (46.2%, 30/65) than the OVS (37.3%, 28/75) group, this difference was statistically insignificant. Thus, because of the greater response to GnRH-2 and P/AI in MOVS compared with the OVS group, the MOVS protocol can be used to improve P/AI in lactating dairy cows during the summer, but further studies are needed to be evaluated the effects of the MOVS protocol on P/AI during the summer.
The aim of this study was to test two different timed artificial insemination (AI) protocols in order to improve the percentage of pregnant cows per AI in lactating dairy cows during the summer. Cows (n=140) were randomly divided into two groups; cows in the OVS group (n=75) received the Ovsynch protocol (GnRH–7d–PGF2α–2d–GnRH–16h–AI), and cows in the MOVS group (n=65) received the Ovsynch protocol with exogenous progesterone (P4) which administrated between GnRH and PGF2α. In addition, GnRH was injected 7 d after AI in the MOVS group (GnRH–P4–7d –PGF2α–2d–GnRH–16h–AI–7d–GnRH). Response to the second GnRH treatment of Ovsynch (GnRH-2) was greater (P<0.03) in the MOVS (98.5%) than the OVS (89.3%) group. Although P/AI at 31 d was numerically greater in the MOVS (46.2%, 30/65) than the OVS (37.3%, 28/75) group, this difference was statistically insignificant. Thus, because of the greater response to GnRH-2 and P/AI in MOVS compared with the OVS group, the MOVS protocol can be used to improve P/AI in lactating dairy cows during the summer, but further studies are needed to be evaluated the effects of the MOVS protocol on P/AI during the summer.
The aim of this study was to test two different timed artificial insemination (AI) protocols in order to improve the percentage of pregnant cows per AI in lactating dairy cows during the summer. Cows (n=140) were randomly divided into two groups; cows in the OVS group (n=75) received the Ovsynch protocol (GnRH–7d–PGF2α–2d–GnRH–16h–AI), and cows in the MOVS group (n=65) received the Ovsynch protocol with exogenous progesterone (P4) which administrated between GnRH and PGF2α. In addition, GnRH was injected 7 d after AI in the MOVS group (GnRH–P4–7d –PGF2α–2d–GnRH–16h–AI–7d–GnRH). Response to the second GnRH treatment of Ovsynch (GnRH-2) was greater (P<0.03) in the MOVS (98.5%) than the OVS (89.3%) group. Although P/AI at 31 d was numerically greater in the MOVS (46.2%, 30/65) than the OVS (37.3%, 28/75) group, this difference was statistically insignificant. Thus, because of the greater response to GnRH-2 and P/AI in MOVS compared with the OVS group, the MOVS protocol can be used to improve P/AI in lactating dairy cows during the summer, but further studies are needed to be evaluated the effects of the MOVS protocol on P/AI during the summer.
Açıklama
Kaynak:
Anahtar Kelimeler:
Konusu
Cow, Ovsynch, Summer, Pregnancy, Sığır, Yaz dönemi, Gebelik
Alıntı
Mecitoglu, G. Y. vd. (2012). "Improving conception rate in lactating dairy cows by using modified ovsynch protocol during summer". Journal of Biological and Environmental Sciences, 6(18), 207-212.