Karabük devlet hastanesi’ne başvuran ürolojik acil olguların analizi
Date
2009-04-06
Authors
Akıncı, Halim
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Uludağ Üniversitesi
Abstract
Bu çalışmada; Karabük Devlet Hastanesi’ne başvuran ürolojik acil olguların epidemiyolojik, klinik tanı ve tedavi seçeneklerinin araştırılması amaçlandı. Karabük Devlet Hastanesi Acil Servisi’ne Aralık 2006- Aralık 2008 tarihleri arasında başvuran ürolojik acil olgular retrospektif olarak incelendi. Acil servise başvuran 207 568 olgunun 5 544’ü (% 2,67) ürolojik olgulardı. Olguların %45,3’ü erkek (ortalama yaş : 47,4), %54,6’sı kadın (ortalama yaş: 37,9), %5,2’si çocuk, %13,24’ü 70 yaş üzeri olgulardı. En sık görülen olgu grubu, %54,15 ile genitoüriner sistem enfeksiyonlardı. Bunu renal kolik (%33,1) ve akut üriner retansiyon (%7,97) olguları izlemekteydi. Genitoüriner sistem travmaları 72 (%1,3) olguda görüldü. Olguların 490’ı (%8,83) hastaneye yatırılarak tedavi edildi ve 98’ine (%1,76) acil cerrahi girişim uygulandı. Perkütan sistostomi en sık uygulanan ( 60 olgu, %61,22) cerrahi girişimdi. Yalnızca 6 olgu başka bir merkeze refere edildi. Üroloji uzmanının konsültasyon için hastaneye gelmesi 502 (%9,05) olguda gerekli oldu. Literatürde, acil servislere başvuran ürolojik hasta grubu ile ilgili epidemiyolojik veriler kısıtlıdır. Bu verileri artırmak için geniş hasta grupları olan çalışmalara ihtiyaç vardır. Çoğu ürolojik acil olgu, acil cerrahi girişim gerektirmese de, tedaviye hızlı karar vermek bazen geç komplikasyonların oluşmasını engelleyecektir. Bu nedenle acil serviste çalışan doktorların ürolojik acillere karşı uyanık olmaları gereklidir.
In this study, we aimed to investigate the epidemiology, clinical presentation and the therapeutic interventions of urological emergencies in Karabük State Hospital. Urological emergency cases admitted to the emergency room of Karabük State Hospital between December 2006 and December 2008 were investigated retrospectively. Among 207 568 emergency cases, 5 544 (2,67%) were urologic emergencies. 45,3% were male (mean age: 47,4 years), 54,6% were female (mean age:37,9 years), 5,2% of the cases were children and 13,24% were older than 70. The most frequent emergencies were genitourinary infections constituting 54,15% of cases followed by renal colic (33,1%) and acute urinary retantion (7,97%). 72 patients had genitourinary system trauma (1,3%). 490 (8,83%) cases were hospitalized and 98 (1,76) underwent emergent surgical intervention. The most frequent surgical intervention was percutaneous cystostomy catheterisation in 60 patients (61,22%). Only 6 patients were reffered to another health center. Consultation with an urologist was required for 502 patients (9,05%). In literature, there is only limited data about the epidemiology of urological emergencies and further studies with large patient series are necessary to increase the data. Most of the urological emergency cases do not require emergent surgical intervention however, abrupt decision making in treatment is important to prevent late complications. That’s why the physicans working in emergency rooms must be aware of the urological emergencies.
In this study, we aimed to investigate the epidemiology, clinical presentation and the therapeutic interventions of urological emergencies in Karabük State Hospital. Urological emergency cases admitted to the emergency room of Karabük State Hospital between December 2006 and December 2008 were investigated retrospectively. Among 207 568 emergency cases, 5 544 (2,67%) were urologic emergencies. 45,3% were male (mean age: 47,4 years), 54,6% were female (mean age:37,9 years), 5,2% of the cases were children and 13,24% were older than 70. The most frequent emergencies were genitourinary infections constituting 54,15% of cases followed by renal colic (33,1%) and acute urinary retantion (7,97%). 72 patients had genitourinary system trauma (1,3%). 490 (8,83%) cases were hospitalized and 98 (1,76) underwent emergent surgical intervention. The most frequent surgical intervention was percutaneous cystostomy catheterisation in 60 patients (61,22%). Only 6 patients were reffered to another health center. Consultation with an urologist was required for 502 patients (9,05%). In literature, there is only limited data about the epidemiology of urological emergencies and further studies with large patient series are necessary to increase the data. Most of the urological emergency cases do not require emergent surgical intervention however, abrupt decision making in treatment is important to prevent late complications. That’s why the physicans working in emergency rooms must be aware of the urological emergencies.
Description
Keywords
Ürolojik aciller, Epidemiyoloji, Epidemiology, Urological emergencies
Citation
Akıncı, H. (2009). ''Karabük devlet hastanesi’ne başvuran ürolojik acil olguların analizi''. Uludağ Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, 35(1), 17-20.