Comparative investigation of the moth-flame algorithm and whale optimization algorithm for optimal spur gear design

dc.contributor.authorAbderazek, Hammoudi
dc.contributor.authorHamza, Ferhat
dc.contributor.authorSait, Sadiq M.
dc.contributor.buuauthorYıldız, Ali Rıza
dc.contributor.departmentBursa Uludağ Üniversitesi/Mühendislik Fakültesi/Makina Mühendisliği.tr_TR
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-1790-6987tr_TR
dc.contributor.researcheridF-7426-2011tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid7102365439tr_TR
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-23T11:59:22Z
dc.date.available2024-01-23T11:59:22Z
dc.date.issued2021-03
dc.description.abstractIn this study, two recent algorithms, the whale optimization algorithm and moth-flame optimization, are used to optimize spur gear design. The objective function is the minimization of the total weight of the spur gear pair. Moreover, the optimization problem is subjected to constraints on the main kinematic and geometric conditions as well as to the resistance of the material of the gear system. The comparison between mothflame optimization (MFO), the whale optimization algorithm (WOA), and previous studies indicate that the final results obtained from both algorithms lead to a reduction in gear weight by 1.05 %. MFO and the WOA are compared with four additional swarm algorithms. The experimental results indicate that the algorithms introduced here, in particular MFO, outperform the four other methods when compared in terms of solution quality, robustness, and high success rate.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipKing Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia
dc.identifier.citationYıldız, A. R. (2021). "Comparative investigation of the moth-flame algorithm and whale optimization algorithm for optimal spur gear design". Materialpruefung/Materials Testing, 63(3), 266-271.en_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1515/mt-2020-0039
dc.identifier.endpage271tr_TR
dc.identifier.issn0025-5300
dc.identifier.issn2195-8572
dc.identifier.issue3tr_TR
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85106976480tr_TR
dc.identifier.startpage266tr_TR
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/mt-2020-0039/html
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11452/39274
dc.identifier.volume63tr_TR
dc.identifier.wos000636794000010tr_TR
dc.indexed.scopusScopusen_US
dc.indexed.wosSCIEen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWalter De Gruyter GMBHen_US
dc.relation.bapBAP
dc.relation.collaborationYurt içitr_TR
dc.relation.collaborationYurt dışıtr_TR
dc.relation.collaborationSanayitr_TR
dc.relation.journalMaterialpruefung/Materials Testingen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergitr_TR
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectMoth-flame optimizationen_US
dc.subjectWhale optimization algorithmen_US
dc.subjectSpur gearen_US
dc.subjectMeta-heuristicsen_US
dc.subjectMechanical design optimizationen_US
dc.subjectStructural optimizationen_US
dc.subjectGear designen_US
dc.subjectMetaheuristicen_US
dc.subjectMinimisationen_US
dc.subjectObjective functionsen_US
dc.subjectOptimisationsen_US
dc.subjectOptimization algorithmsen_US
dc.subjectSpur gear pairsen_US
dc.subjectOptimizationen_US
dc.subject.scopusCutting Process; Chatter; Turningen_US
dc.subject.wosMaterials Science, Characterization & Testingen_US
dc.titleComparative investigation of the moth-flame algorithm and whale optimization algorithm for optimal spur gear designen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.wos.quartileQ2en_US

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: